Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new loach species of the genus Vanmanenia (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes: Gastromyzontidae) from hill streams of Vietnam
expand article infoHuong Thi Thanh Dang, Huyen Thi Duong, Fan Li§, Huy Quang Nguyen, Hau Duc Tran
‡ Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, Vietnam
§ Shanghai Natural History Museum, Shanghai, China
Open Access

Abstract

Recent ichthyofauna surveys in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Vietnam, yielded 16 specimens of loach representing the genus Vanmanenia. These specimens were uniform in morphology and distinct from known species, leading to the designation of a new species, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. This species is distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: pectoral fin: I, 15; pelvic fin: I, 8; lateral line scales 77–83; the distance from the anus to the posterior insertion of the pelvic fin being greater than from the anus to the anal fin origin; a lateral black stripe from the gill opening to the caudal fin base; a black spot at the caudal fin origin equal to the eye diameter; and a lower lip with three large papillae, with the middle one being larger. The new species differs from Vanmanenia caldwelli (Nichols, 1925) by its mouth soft-tissue structures and lower morphometric values and from Vanmanenia ventrosquamata (Mai, 1978) and Vanmanenia caobangensis Nguyen, 2005 by having more lateral line scales and lower body depth. Additionally, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. has a larger eye and wider interorbital space compared to other species in Vietnam. This species is found in the Red River basin in Vietnam and the Bang Giang River flowing into China, indicating high potential for freshwater fish diversity in these river systems.

Keywords

Bang Giang River, Gam River, new species, northern Vietnam, taxonomy, Vanmanenia

Introduction

The genus Vanmanenia Hora, 1932, commonly known as hillstream loaches represents the family Gastromyzontidae, currently accommodates 24 species (Fricke et al. 2023). Some of its species were formerly assigned to Homalosoma Boulenger, 1901 (see Silas 1953). A total of 22 species can be found in southern China and Vietnam, i.e., Vanmanenia caldwelli (Nichols, 1925); Vanmanenia caobangensis Nguyen, 2005; Vanmanenia gymnetrus Chen, 1980; Vanmanenia hainanensis Chen et Zheng, 1980; Vanmanenia homalocephala Zhang et Zhao, 2000; Vanmanenia lineata (Fang, 1935); Vanmanenia maculata Yi, Zhang & Shen, 2014; Vanmanenia microcephala Li, Zhou et Che, 2019; Vanmanenia microlepis Nguyen, 2005; Vanmanenia monofasciodorsala Nguyen, 2005; Vanmanenia multiloba (Mai, 1978); Vanmanenia nahangensis Nguyen, 2005; Vanmanenia pingchowensis (Fang, 1935); Vanmanenia polylepis Pan, Liu et Zhang, 1983; Vanmanenia pseudostriata Zhu, Zhao, Liu et Niu, 2019; Vanmanenia serrilineata Kottelat, 2000; Vanmanenia stenosoma (Boulenger, 1901); Vanmanenia striata Chen, 1980; Vanmanenia tetraloba (Mai, 1978); Vanmanenia trifasciodorsala Nguyen, 2005; Vanmanenia ventrosquamata (Mai, 1978); and Vanmanenia xinyiensis Zheng et Chen, 1980 (see Li et al. 2019; Deng and Zhang 2020, 2021; Cai et al. 2021), and eight species in Vietnam (Nguyen 2005). Species in this genus prefer living in the fast-flowing waters of mountain brooks of China, Laos, and Vietnam (Yue et al. 2000; Yi et al. 2014). Thus, they could be diverse in the upper reaches of large rivers in northern Vietnam, such as the Red River and the Bang Giang River. In fact, of eight species recorded in northern Vietnam, seven are distributed in the Red River, i.e., V. microlepis , V. monofasciodorsala; V. multiloba, V. nahangensis, V. tetraloba, V. trifasciodorsala, and V. ventrosquamata (see Nguyen et al. 2019) and two species from the Bang Giang River in Cao Bang Province, i.e., V. ventrosquamata and V. caobangensis (see Nguyen 2005; Deng and Zhang 2020) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Distribution of species of the genus Vanmanenia in northern Vietnam.

During the first surveys of the ichthyofauna in in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam (Fig. 2) in 2020 and 2021, 16 specimens of Vanmanenia were collected. Details of their external morphology indicated that all of them were one species, and they did not conform to any of the hitherto known species of the genus Vanmanenia. Therefore, we decided to describe these specimens as a new species, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. and provide a differential diagnosis to distinguish it from all its congeners.

Figure 2. 

Sampling sites of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam.

Materials and methods

Two fieldwork surveys were carried out in May 2020 and May 2021 in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Nguyen Binh District, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam. In this area, there are two different river basin systems, including the Gam River, one of the largest tributaries of the Red River, and the Bang Giang River, known as the Zuo River in China, an upper tributary of the Yu River in southern China (Pearl River basin) (Figs 1, 2). Fish samples were collected by a hand net and by electro-fishing within 30 min per sampling site under the permission of local authorities. From these surveys, a total of 16 specimens of loach representing the genus Vanmanenia was collected at stations DO.02 in the Gam River, DO.05, and DO.07 in the Bang Giang River (Fig. 2). Fish were fixed in 10% formalin solution, and subsequently preserved in 70% ethanol in the Museum of Biology, Hanoi National University of Education. Measurements and counts followed by Yi et al. (2014) and were taken from the left side of each specimen. Measurements were made point-to-point, to the nearest 0.1 mm using calipers, and expressed as a percentage.

Comparative material. Vanmanenia caldwelli: SOU 201807801, 5 specimens, 30.15–62.13 mm SL; China: Fujian Province: Fuqing City; Min River; 7 July 2018.

Results

Taxonomy

Family Gastromyzontidae

Genus Vanmanenia Hora, 1932

Vanmanenia duci sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4, Table 1

Type locality

Vietnam, Cao Bang Province, Nguyen Binh District, Bang Giang River basin, 20°34′731″N, 105°55′407″E.

Holotype

HNUE-F00293, 47.6 mm SL, Vietnam, Cao Bang Province, Nguyen Binh District, Bang Giang River basin, 20°34′731′′N, 105°55′407′′E, ca. 760 m above sea level, 24 May 2020, coll. H.D. Tran, V.S. Ngo, and H.V. Pham; electro-fishing, medium speed current stream with stone and gravel bottom, both the sides fringed by plants.

Paratypes

(n = 15). HNUE-F00294-296, 3 ex., 33.0–50.1 mm SL, data same as for holotype. HNUE-F00297-298, 2 ex., 35.8–39.4 mm SL, same locality as for holotype, 8 May 2021, coll. H.D. Tran, V.S. Ngo, H.Q. Nguyen, N.T. Nguyen, and A.N.T. Do. HNUE-F00299-303, 5 ex., 32.4–52.1 mm SL, Vietnam, Cao Bang Province, Nguyen Binh District, Gam River, 22°35′197″N, 105°51′903″E, 1005 m above sea, 21 May 2020, coll. H.D. Tran, V.S. Ngo, and H.V. Pham; electro-fishing and hand net, fast speed current stream with large stone and sandy bottom, both the sides fringed by plants. HNUE-F00304-305, 2 ex., 48.3–54.0 mm SL, same locality as for HNUE-F00299, 7 May 2021, coll. H.D. Tran, V.S. Ngo, H.Q. Nguyen, N.T. Nguyen, and A.N.T. Do. HNUE-F00306, 1 ex., 41.3 mm SL, 8 May 2021, other data same as for HNUE-F00303. HNUE-F00307-308, 2 ex., 39.1–40.3 mm SL, Vietnam: Cao Bang Province, Nguyen Binh District, Bang Giang River basin, 22°39′289″N, 105°55′339″E, 500 m above sea, 22 May 2020, coll. H.D. Tran, V.S. Ngo, and H.V. Pham; electro-fishing and hand net, fast speed current stream with gravel bottom.

Diagnosis

Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. can be distinguished from congeners by following combination of characters: pectoral fin rays: I, 15; pelvic fin rays: I, 8; lateral line scales: 77–83; anus farther posterior insertion of pelvic fin than to anal fin origin, caudal peduncle depth approximately as caudal peduncle length (8.2%–8.5%), distance from pelvic fin to pectoral fin (39.1%) larger than distance from pelvic fin to anal fin (29.8%). It has a broad midlateral black stripe running from behind head to caudal-peduncle base. Black dotted stripe stretching from base of pectoral fin to posterior end of anal fin. Lower lip with three large papillae; median wider than two lateral ones. Rostral fold divided into three triangular lobules of same size. Distinct black dot at base of pelvic and pectoral fins, and fleshy black protrusion in pelvic fin base.

Description

Meristic and morphometric data for type specimens are presented in Table 1. View of body and its mouth structures are shown in Figs 3, 4, 5A. Body elongate, anteriorly depressed before dorsal-fin origin and posteriorly compressed laterally. Body width almost as wide as body depth. Dorsal profile of head and predorsal body slightly curved, and flat ventral profile. Moderate gill opening extending to ventral surface for short distance in front of pectoral fin base (Fig. 3).

Table 1.

Morphometric and meristic data for examined materials of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. from Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Vietnam.

Character Vanmanenia duci sp. nov.
Holotype Paratypes (n = 15)
Mean SD Range
Absolute morphometric values [mm]
Standard length (SL) 47.6 42.5 7.03 32.4–54.0
Relative morphometric values [% in SL]
Body depth 16.4 15.6 0.02 12.2–18.7
Predorsal length 53.0 51.2 0.01 48.6–53.7
Prepelvic length 55.5 54.4 0.01 51.7–56.8
Preanal length 84.7 84.4 0.01 82.9–86.1
Pectoral-to pelvic-fin insertion 40.1 39.1 0.02 34.3–41.9
Pelvic-fin insertion to anal-fin origin (PFAF) 29.6 29.8 0.01 27.6–31.1
Pectoral-fin base length 10.1 9.5 0.01 7.1–10.7
Pelvic-fin base length 4.4 4.2 0.01 3.6–5.0
Dorsal-fin base length 13.5 11.6 0.01 9.9–13.6
Anal-fin base length 5.3 4.6 0.01 3.7–6.0
Anus to anal-fin origin 8.8 9.5 0.02 7.1–14.7
Caudal-peduncle length (CPL) 7.9 8.2 0.01 7.5–9.8
Caudal-peduncle depth 8.4 8.5 0.01 7.9–9.1
Pectoral-fin length 29.4 29.2 0.01 27.8–30.0
Pelvic-fin length 20.2 19.7 0.01 18.8–20.9
Anal-fin length 16.4 16.1 0.01 14.2–19.3
Dorsal-fin length 23.5 22.5 0.01 20.5–24.1
Head length (HL) 16.2 16.0 0.01 15.4–16.7
Relative morphometric values [% in CPL]
Caudal-peduncle depth 106.7 102.8 0.04 92.5–111.1
Relative morphometric values [% in PFAF]
Anus to anal-fin origin 12.7 13.8 0.03 10.4–21.0
Relative morphometric values [% in HL]
Head depth 66.2 64.6 0.06 52.8–79.5
Snout length 58.4 65.6 0.04 59.2–72.5
Head width 83.8 82.6 0.04 75.5–88.5
Eye diameter 24.0 25.7 0.03 21.0–30.4
Interorbital width 54.6 56.0 0.02 52.8–61.5
Mouth width 20.1 21.9 0.02 18.9–26.5
Meristic data
Dorsal-fin rays III, 7 III, 7
Pectoral-fin rays I, 15 I, 15
Pelvic-fin rays I, 8 I, 8
Anal-fin rays II, 5 II, 5
Lateral-line scales 83 77–83
Figure 3. 

Vanmanenia duci sp. nov., HNUE-F00293, SL = 47.6 mm in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam.

Figure 4. 

Aquarium photograph of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. (HNUE-F00293, 47.6 mm SL) from northern Vietnam.

Figure 5. 

Mouth soft-tissue structures of two very similar species of Vanmanenia in Vietnam and China: (A) Vanmanenia duci sp. nov., HNUE-F00293, 47.6 mm SL, (B) Vanmanenia caldwelli, 62.1 mm SL (photo by Fan Li). Abbreviations: lj = lower jaw, mb = maxillary barbel, rb = rostral barbel, rf = rostral fold, uj = upper jaw, ul = upper lip, ll = lower lip, lb = lobulated papillae.

Head depressed, slightly longer than wide, and wider than deep. Snout broadly rounded in dorsal view and bluntly pointed in lateral view. Small eyes situated dorsolaterally in posterior half of head, with interorbital space bigger than eye diameter. Nostrils large, closer to eyes than to snout. Small fleshy papillae above top of head and edges of the eyes. Mouth inferior, medium-sized and curved, with muzzle grooves and muzzle folds in front. Snout groove wide and shallow, extending to corner of mouth (Fig. 3). Lips fleshy; upper lip covered with conspicuous papillae, and shallow groove present with rostral fold and, disconnected from lower lip at corners of mouth; lower lip with three large papillae, slightly tips curved, one median bigger than lateral two ones. Rostral fold divided into three triangular lobules same size, and two pairs of lobulated papillae between the folds, with inner side mastoid. Two pairs of rostral barbels, outer pair larger than inner pair, and about 1/2 of eye diameter (Fig. 5A). Body covered by small scales, present except on anterior pectoral fin to pelvic fin base, and on ventral surface in front of and between bases of pectoral fins. Lateral line complete and straight. No spine on dorsal fin, with 3 simple and 7 branched rays. Its origin anterior to pelvic fin origin, closer to caudal fin base than to tip of snout, and distal margin slightly straight. Two simple and 5 branched rays on anal fin, and its origin nearer to anus than to caudal fin base. One simple and 15 branched rays on pectoral fin, much longer than head length. Its base slightly behind lower extremity of eye, tip of adpressed fin not reaching pelvic-fin insertion. One simple and 8 branched rays on pelvic fin. Its origin closer to caudal fin base than to snout tip and tip of adpressed fin touching or exceeding anus, but far from anal fin origin. Anus positioned closer to anal fin origin than to base of pelvic fin. Caudal fin slightly concave, with lower lobe slightly longer than upper lobe.

Coloration (freshly collected)

Body yellowish-brown; belly a pale ivory color (Figs 3, 4). Head with small, irregular, black bars and blotches on cheeks and snout. Dorsum with eight or nine black blotches and irregular small blotches. Round black protrusions on pectoral and pelvic fin bases. One brown-black band across rays on dorsal fin, and two in caudal fin. Pectoral and pelvic fins pale yellow. Midlateral black stripe from behind head to caudal fin base. A brown-black dotted stripe along from pectoral-fin base to posterior insertion of the anal fin; caudal fin base with a black spot of eye size (Fig. 4).

Coloration (preserved)

Specimens fixed in formalin solution with yellowish body and head; belly yellow. Black bars present on behind of head to caudal fin base. Black dotted stripes from posterior end of pectoral fin to anal fin. These fins pale whitish, with black bands across rays of dorsal and caudal fins (Fig. 3).

Distribution

Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. is known only from three localities in the Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam (Fig. 2). Other species of Vanmanenia are distributed in different localities of the Red River and Bang Giang River.

Habitat and ecology

Figure 6 shows the three known localities of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. The holotype was found in a narrow forests stream with medium speed current and gravel bottom (Fig. 6A). Co-occurring fish species included Parazacco sp. (Duong et al. 2022); Liniparhomaloptera cf. qiongzhongensis Zheng et Chen, 1980; Schistura sp.; Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758); Discogobio sp., Rhinogobius duospilus (Herre, 1935) (see Nguyen et al. 2024). Several paratypes were found in a fast speed current forest stream with large stones and sand as bottom (Fig. 6B). This sampling site is next to the road, where a new bridge is under construction. There were several other fish species, including Schistura sp. (see Nguyen et al. 2024) and Chimarrichthys nami (Tran, Nguyen, Dang, Nguyen et Nguyen, 2023). At the third sampling site (Fig. 6C), accompanying fish species included Beaufortia pingi (Fang, 1930); Schistura spp.; Barbodes semifasciolatus (Günther, 1868); Discogobio microstoma (Mai, 1978); Onychostoma gerlachi (Peters, 1881); Discogobio spp.; Hemibarbus cf. umbrifer (Lin, 1931); and Gambusia affinis (Baird et Girard, 1853) (see Nguyen et al. 2024).

Figure 6. 

Habitat of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov., in the Gam River (DO.02) and Bang Giang River (DO.05, DO.07) in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, northern Vietnam.

Etymology

The specific name is in honor of Vietnamese ichthyologist, Prof. Nguyen Huu Duc, who had spent his whole life studying freshwater fishes in Vietnam.

Discussion

Species group with black mid-lateral stripe. Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. differs from all other species of Vanmanenia except V. caldwelli, V. lineata, and V. homalocephala by having a broad black midlateral stripe on the body (vs. having bars or irregular blotches) (Figs 3, 4, 7 in the presently reported study; fig. 278 in Yue et al. 2000; fig. 1 in Zhang and Zhao 2000). Vanmanenia homalocephala and V. lineata are distributed in Xi-Jiang of the Pearl River basin (Yue et al. 2000; Zhang and Zhao 2000; Deng and Zhang 2020). The new species could be distinguished from V. lineata by maxillary barbel and lower lip in the mouth (fig. 1 in Li et al. 2019; Fig. 5A in the presently reported study). Vanmanenia homalocephala and Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. could be distinguished by scales in lateral line (95–100 vs. 77–83) and color pattern on the back (5–6 vs. 19 dark saddle-backed stripes) (fig. 1 in Zhang and Zhao 2000; Fig. 3 in the presently reported study).

Figure 7. 

Vanmanenia caldwelli (62.1 mm SL) collected from the Min River, in Fuqing City, Fujian Province, China (Photos by Fan Li).

The last species having a black midlateral stripe on the body is V. caldwelli, which is distributed in Min-Jiang River (Deng and Zhang 2021), far from the study site. Both V. caldwelli and Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. share the same gross morphology (Table 2). However, values of the majority of the measurements of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. are lower than the range of measurements of V. caldwelli, such as body depth (12.2%–18.7%), caudal-peduncle depth (7.9%–9.1%), or head length (15.4%–16.7%), although snout length and eye diameter of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. are larger than those of V. caldwelli (59.2%–72.5%, 21.0%–30.4%; respectively) (Table 2). In addition, the distance from the anus to posterior end of pelvic fin is farther than the distance from the anus to anterior insertion of the anal fin (vs. closer). Both species have a longitudinal black stripe on the body (Figs 3, 7), but the starting position of this stripe in the two species is different. It starts from the tip of the snout in V. caldwelli and just behind the head in Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. The mouth structure is somewhat similar between the two species since they have a lower lip with three triangular lobes, the middle lobe larger than two lateral lobes, two pairs of maxillary barbel at the corner of the mouth, and the outer pair is larger than the lateral lobes (Fig. 5A, 5B). Nevertheless, the upper lip of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. is thin, with four conspicuous lobulated papillae, rostral barbels alternate with lobulated papillae and rostral folds clear (vs. a thick upper lip, lobulated papillae are absent and rostral folds are unclear in V. caldwelli). The lower jaw of V. duci sp. nov. is larger and deeper (vs. small and shallow) (Figs 5A, 5B). Besides, both species have a slightly black spot in the middle caudal fin base, but Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. has a black spot equal to the eye diameter (vs. smaller than the eye diameter). Moreover, the number of black bands across rays of dorsal and caudal fins of species Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. are fewer than those in V. caldwelli (1, 2 vs. 2, 3, respectively). The caudal fin shape is also clearly different between the two species (slightly truncate in Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. vs. forked in V. caldwelli) (Figs 3, 7). There is a larger black dot at the base of the pelvic and pectoral fins and a fleshy larger black protrusion of pelvic fin base in the new species than those in V. caldwelli. The new species has a black dotted stripe along from the posterior end of the pectoral fin to the posterior insertion of the anal fin (vs. absent in V. caldwelli) (Figs 3, 7).

Table 2.

Morphometric and meristic data for examined materials of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. in Vietnam and its very similar species, Vanmanenia caldwelli in China.

Character Species, locality, reference, and number of specimens
Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. Vanmanenia caldwelli
Gam and Bang Giang Rivers, Vietnam Min River, Fuqing City, China Yenping, Chungan, Fukein, China Min-Jiang basin, China Yenping, Fukien, China Min-Jiang basin at Chong’an, south China Min-Jiang basin, China
This study This study Silas 1953 Deng and Zhang 2020 Nichols 1925 Yi et al. 2014 Yue et al. 2000
n = 16 n = 5 n = 4 n = 10 n = 1 n = 8 n = 16
Absolute morphometric values [mm]
Standard length (SL) 32.4–54.0 30.2–62.1 40.7–56.4 48 49.3–70.5 41–72
Relative morphometric values [% in SL]
Body depth 12.2–18.7 18.1–20.4 14.3–14.8 17.1–20.1 20 14.3–17.7 21.7–28.6
Predorsal length 48.6–53.7 51.9–55.3 50.9–53.3 50.1–52.2 50.0–52.6
Prepelvic length 51.7–56.8 55.2–59.5 55.0–60.7 52.2–57.1 52.6–55.6
Preanal length 82.9–86.1 80.6–84.2 80.9–87.8 80.8–85.5
Pectoral-to pelvic-fin insertion 34.3–41.9 33.9–39.2 37.1–42.8 36.6–41.2
Pelvic-fin insertion to anal-fin origin 27.6–31.1 24.4–27.6 24.6–28.4 24.8–27.9
Caudal-peduncle depth 7.9–9.1 10.3–13.4 9.1–11.2 9.2–10.2 10.0–11.0
Pectoral-fin length 27.8–30.0 19.8–22.9 22.4–26.7 22.9–26.2
Pelvic-fin length 18.8–20.9 15.2–20.0 19.1–23.4 18.9–20.9
Anal-fin length 14.2–19.3 16.0–18.1 16.6–19.7 15.9–19.4
Dorsal-fin length 20.5–24.1 21.2–22.8 19.8–24.9 22.4–25.0
Head length (HL) 15.4–16.7 18.6–20.7 20.0–21.1 20.5–22.6 21.7 18.4–20.6 16.7–18.9
Relative morphometric values [% in HL]
Snout length 59.2–72.5 43.2–48.1 33.3–44.4 40.0–49.2 50.0 45.5–56.1 41.7–55.6
Eye diameter 21.0–30.4 20.5–27.8 19.1–23.5 24.9–30.7 20.0 19.3–24.7 16.7–22.2
Meristic data
Dorsal-fin rays III, 7 III, 8 III, 8 III, 7 10 III, 7 III, 7
Pectoral-fin rays I, 15 I, 13 I, 13–14 I, 13 I, 13–15 I, 13–15
Pelvic-fin rays I, 8 I, 8 I, 6–7 I, 8 I, 8 I, 8
Anal-fin rays II, 5 II, 5 ; II, 6 III, 5 II, 5 7 II, 5 II, 5
Lateral-line scales 77–83 150 70–81 150 76–92 76–92

Species group without black mid-lateral stripe. The new species was collected in the Red River and the Bang Giang River (a tributary of the Pearl River in China) (Fig. 1). Thus, the presently reported study attempted to compare the morphology of the new species with known species of Vanmanenia in this group from the Red River and the Pearl River basins.

In the Red River, two species V. tetraloba, V. striata are present in this group from China (Li et al. 2019). These two species are different from the new species by body color patterns (flank with 11–21 vermiculations presence vs. absence) and mouth soft-tissue structures (figs. 7, 8 in Li et al. 2019; fig. 3 in Yi et al. 2014; Figs 3, 5A, 5B, 8A, 8B, 8C in the presently reported study). As we can see from Fig. 1, this genus is diverse in the Red River basin located in Vietnam. Differences between Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. and the six species of Vanmanenia occurring in the Red River basin from Vietnam are listed in Tables 3, 4. The new species could be distinguished from its congeners in the Red River basin by the number of scales in the lateral line (Table 3). For example, the new species has fewer lateral-line scales (77–83) than V. tetraloba (104–112), V. trifasciodorsala (169), V. monofasciodorsala (164), and V. microlepis (124–135). Furthermore, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. has a shorter head than V. nahangensis (15.4%–16.7% vs. 20.70%) (Table 3), which is distributed in the Gam River, a different tributary of the Red River opposite to the Black River, where other four species of Vanmanenia present (Fig. 1). The records of this new species and others, such as Pareuchiloglanis sp. (Tran et al. 2021), Parazacco sp. (Duong et al. 2022), and Chimarrichthys nami (see Tran et al. 2023) further indicate that the Red River basin is a home of many freshwater fish species (Nguyen et al. 2019). In the Pearl River, in addition to V. lineata and V. homalocephala as mentioned above, there are four species of this genus, i.e., V. gymnetrus, V. intermidia, V. pingchowensis, and V. polylepis in China. The new species differs from V. gymnetrus, V. intermidia, and V. pingchowensis in body color patterns (a broad black midlateral stripe on the body vs. absence) and mouth soft-tissue structures (fig. 1 in Li et al. 2019; figs. 2, 3, 7 in Deng and Zhang 2020; Figs 3, 5A, 5B in the presently reported study). Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. can be distinguished from V. polylepis by the patch type on the caudal-fin base (complete vs. dissociated) (Li et al. 2019; Fig. 3 in the presently reported study). This character is also available to indicate the new species differing from V. lineata, V. homalocephala, V. caldwelli, V. striata, and V. pingchowensis (see Li et al. 2019). There are two species of Vanmanenia in the Pearl River from Vietnam, i.e., V. caobangensis and V. ventrosquamata (Fig. 1). Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. has a slightly similar number of fin rays as V. ventrosquamata and V. caobangensis (Table 3), but the new species has a shorter head than V. caobangensis (7.54%–9.81% vs. 20.04%–21.23%) and shorter caudal-peduncle than V. ventrosquamata (7.54%–9.81% vs. 12.56%). In addition, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. is further distinct from the species from the Red River and Pearl River basins in Vietnam in having a bigger eye, and a wider interorbital (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison meristic and morphometric data of Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. with other species of Vanmanenia occurring in northern Vietnam.

Character Species, locality, reference, and number of specimens
Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. Vanmanenia ventrosquamata Vanmanenia tetraloba Vanmanenia trifasciodorsala Vanmanenia caobangensis Vanmanenia nahangensis Vanmanenia monofasciodorsala Vanmanenia microlepis Vanmanenia multiloba
Red River, Pearl River Pearl River Red River Red River Pearl River Red River Red River Red River Red River
This study Nguyen 2005 Mai 1978
n = 16 n = 1 n = 7 n = 9 n = 5 n = 1 n = 5 n = 3
Absolute morphometric values [mm]
Standard length (SL) 32.4–54.0 73.2 52.0–80.0 64.5–77.3 45.0–61.0 59.0 72.0–92.5 63.0–84.0 48.0–71.0
Relative morphometric values [% in SL]
Body depth 12.2–18.7 16.4 15.4–19.6 16.0–19.7 18.0–22.3 18.7 19.6–20.8 21.1–22.8 17.0
Caudal-peduncle length (CPL) 7.5–9.8 12.6 10.2–13.7 10.1–14.1 10.8–12.4 9.2 11.3–12.6 11.2–12.8
Caudal-peduncle depth 7.9–9.1 8.4 7.8–9.0 7.8–8.8 9.1–9.6 10.2 8.9–10.7 9.3–9.5
Head length (HL) 15.4–16.7 16.4 18.9–21.1 20.3–22.5 20.0–21.2 20.7 22.7–23.9 20.5–24.5 19.7
Relative morphometric values [% in CPL]
Caudal-peduncle depth 92.5–111.1 87.0 65.8–82.7 56.2–87.7 77.5–86.2 109.9 70.4–87.7 75.2–84.8
Relative morphometric values [% in HL]
Eye diameter 21.0–30.4 18.2 14.5–18.6 16.4–17.3 17.1–20.7 18.9 13.0–16.4 12.1–16.9 19.1
Interorbital width 52.4–61.5 46.3 35.0–5 32.4–39.5 39.1–47.0 43.5 36.0–40.7 43.7–46.1
Meristic data
Dorsal-fin rays III, 7 III, 7 III, 7 II, 7 III, 7 III, 7 II, 7 II, 7 I, 7
Pectoral-fin rays I, 15 I, 15 I, 14–15 I, 15 I, 15–16 I, 17 I, 14–16 I, 15
Pelvic-fin rays I, 8 I, 8 I, 8 I, 8 I, 8 I, 7 I, 8 I, 9
Anal-fin rays II, 5 I, 5 II, 5 II, 5 II, 5 I, 5 II, 5 II, 5 I, 5
Lateral-line scales 77–83 69–70 104–112 169 64–67 60 164 124–135 90–100
Table 4.

Morphological comparison among nine species of Vanmanenia in northern Vietnam.

Parameter Species and reference
Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. Vanmanenia ventrosquamata Vanmanenia tetraloba Vanmanenia trifasciodorsala Vanmanenia caobangensis Vanmanenia nahangensis Vanmanenia monofasciodorsala Vanmanenia microlepis Vanmanenia multiloba
This study Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Nguyen 2005 Mai 1978
Lobes on lower lip structures 3 triangular lobules; median one wider than two lateral ones 3 lobules; median one wider than two lateral ones 3 lobules nearly equal in width 3 lobules nearly equal in width 3 lobules; median one wider than two lateral ones 3 lobules; median one wider than two lateral ones 3 lobules; median one wider than two lateral ones 3 lobules nearly equal in width
Barbels at mouth corner 2 pairs 2 pairs 1 pair 1 pair 1 pair 2 pairs 1 pair 1 pair 1 pair
Position of dorsal fin base Farther to snout tip than to caudal-fin origin Between snout tip and caudal-fin origin Between snout tip and caudal-fin origin Between snout tip and caudal-fin origin Farther to snout tip than to caudal-fin origin Between snout tip and caudal-fin origin Closer to snout-tip than to caudal-fin origin Farther to snout tip than to caudal-fin origin Between snout tip and caudal-fin origin
Position of anal fin base Closer to anus than to caudal-fin origin Between anus and caudal-fin origin Closer to anus than to caudal-fin origin Closer to anus than to caudal-fin origin Between anus and caudal-fin origin Between anus and caudal-fin origin Closer to anus than to caudal-fin origin
Anus position Farther to pelvic-fin posterior insertion than to anal-fin origin Closer to pelvic-fin posterior insertion than to anal-fin Between pelvic-fin posterior insertion and anal-fin origin Between pelvic-fin posterior insertion and anal-fin origin Between pelvic-fin posterior insertion and anal-fin origin Between pelvic-fin posterior insertion and anal- fin origin Closer to pelvic-fin posterior insertion than to anal-fin origin Between pelvic-fin posterior insertion and anal-fin origin Closer to pelvic-fin posterior insertion than to anal-fin origin
Shape of caudal fin Slightly concave Slightly concave Slightly concave Deeply concave Obliquely concave Slightly concave Slightly concave Slightly concave Truncate
Scales distribution Absent from prepectoral-fin to pelvic-fin origin; small scales present on postpelvic fin Absent on prepectoral-fin; small scales present from postpectoral fin to caudal fin Absent on chest and abdomen; small scales present on origin of prepelvic fin Absent on chest and abdomen to pelvic-fin insertion Absent on prepectoral fin; small scales present on postpectoral fin Absent on prepectoral fin; small scales present on postpectoral fin to anal fin Absent from chest to pelvic-fin origin; few areas with scales present on anterior part of both sides of pelvic-fin origin Absent on chest and abdomen anterior to pelvic fins Absent on chest
Coloration Longitudinal black stripe from back of head to caudal fin origin base along lateral line on side of body; 8–9 brown-black saddles across back of head to caudal fin base; black spot slightly smaller than eye diameter at caudal fin origin Many large and small irregular black blotches on dorsal profile, darker on lateral line; black blotch on belly border; large patch at caudal fin base 8–10 brown-black saddles across dorsal midline to caudal fin base; horizontal black bars thick and thin in front, and short and dark at back of body; longitudinal dark black stripe along lateral line 5 black saddles on dorsal profile: two spots in front of dorsal fin, and 3 dark spots behind dorsal fin; 28–30 irregular, evenly spaced black saddles 7 large round black blotches on dorsal profile; many black saddles on lateral line; black blotch bar on near belly border; many dark black spots in middle of caudal fin rays 6–8 round black spots across dorsal midline to caudal-fin base; irregular black notches on lateral line 4 wide, evenly spaced black saddles on dorsal profile and body: 1 on predorsal fin, 1 near end of dorsal-fin origin, and 2 on caudal fin bas; 19–21 irregular black horizontal bars on both sides of body; being shorter in anterior and posterior parts and longer in the mone; no bar on belly and lower part of caudal fin 20–22 horizontal black bars, being thicker and narrower in anterior part, and larger, heavier, and sparser in posterior one, mostly connected between both sides of body; no longitudinal black stripe along lateral line; black dot on upper caudal fin Many irregularly arranged black blotches on body; large black dot on caudal fin base
Figure 8. 

Mouth soft-tissue structures of three species of Vanmanenia distributed in the same river basin, the Red River in Vietnam and China: (A) Vanmanenia duci sp. nov., HNUE-F00304, 47.60 mm SL; (B) Vanmanenia striata, IHB 646482, 53.20 mm SL (Yi et al. 2014); (C) Vanmanenia tetraloba, SWFC 0512252, 75.30 mm SL (Li et al. 2019. Abbreviations: lj = lower jaw, mb = maxillary barbel, rb = rostral barbel, rf = rostral fold, uj = upper jaw, ul = upper lip, ll = lower lip, lb = lobulated papillae.

Remarkably, Vanmanenia duci sp. nov. differs from other species of the genus in the Red River and Pearl River systems in Vietnam by presenting a longitudinal black stripe from the back of the head to the caudal fin origin along the lateral line on the side of the body and mouth soft-tissue structures (Figs 3, 5A; Table 4).

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by The NEF Bio-ecological Nature Conservation Project in the Mountainous Region of North Vietnam (Nagao Natural Environment Foundation, Japan/Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies). Thanks to V.S. Ngo, T.T. Tran, H.V. Pham, N.T. Nguyen, A.N.T. Do, who assisted in collecting specimens. We thank anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped improve the manuscript.

References

  • Deng SQ, Zhang E (2020) Vanmanenia intermedia Fang, 1935, a valid hillstream species of loach (Teleostei: Gastromyzontidae) from the middle Yangtze River basin, southwest China. Zootaxa 4819(1): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4819.1.5
  • Deng SQ, Zhang E (2021) Vanmanenia marmorata, a new species of loach (Teleostei: Gastromyzontidae) from the middle Chang-Jiang Basin in Guizhou Province, south China. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e72432. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e72432
  • Duong TH, Tran DH, Dang TTH, Nguyen QH (2022) Mô tả các mẫu vật thuộc giống cá chuôn Parazacco (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) thu ở Bắc Việt Nam [Description of specimens of genus Parazacco (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) collected in Northern Vietnam. ] Tap chi Khoa hoc và Cong Nghe – Dai hoc Thai Nguyen— TNU Journal of Science and Technology 227(14): 388–396. [In Vietnamese with English abstract] https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.6510
  • Li X, Zhou W, Che X (2019) Loaches of Vanmanenia (Cypriniformes: Gastromyzontidae) from Yunnan, China with description of a new species. Zootaxa 4603(1): 125–144. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4603.1.6
  • Mai DY (1978) Định loại cá nước ngọt các tỉnh phía Bắc Việt Nam. [Identification of freshwater fish in the northern provinces of Vietnam. ] Nha xuat ban Khoa hoc va Ki thuat—Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 340 pp. [In Vietnamese]
  • Nguyen VH (2005) Cá nước ngọt Việt Nam, Tập 2 [Freshwater Fish of Vietnam, Volume II. ] Nha xuat ban Nong nghiep—Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 760 pp. [In Vietnamese]
  • Nguyen HD, Ngo TMH, Tran DH (2019) List of fish in the Hong River, Viet Nam. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Ichthyology in Vietnam. Nha xuat ban Khoa hoc Tu nhien và Cong nghe—Publishing House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam, 22–39.
  • Nguyen QH, Dang TTH, Ta TT, Duong TH, Tran DH (2024) Bước đầu ghi nhận về khu hệ cá tại Vườn Quốc gia Phia Oắc-Phia Đén, tỉnh Cao Bằng, Bắc Việt Nam. [Preliminary data on the ichthyofauna in Phia Oac-Phia Den National Park, Cao Bang Province, northern Vietnam. ] Tap chi Khoa hoc và Cong Nghe – Dai hoc Thai Nguyen— TNU Journal of Science and Technology 229(13): 52–60. [In Vietnamese with English abstract] https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.10286
  • Nichols JT (1925) Homaloptera caldwelli, a new Chinese loach. American Museum Novitates 1925(172): [Unknown page number].
  • Tran DH, Dang TTH, Ta TT, Ngo TX (2021) Mô tả loài cá chiên bẹt Pareuchiloglanis sp. (Siluriformes: Sisoridae) ở lưu vực sông Đà, địa phận huyện Phong Thổ, tỉnh Lai Châu. [Description of Pareuchiloglanis sp. (Siluriformes: Sisoridae) in the Da River basin belonging to Phong Tho district, Lai Chau province.] Tap Chi Khoa Hoc Tu Nhien—HNUE Journal of Science 66(4F): 103–115. [In Vietnamese with English abstract] https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1059.2021-0073
  • Tran DH, Nguyen HD, Dang TTH, Nguyen QH, Nguyen TN (2023) A new species of Euchiloglanis Regan, 1907 (Actinopterygii: Sisoridae) from Vietnam. Acta Zoologica Bulgaria 75(1): 3–11.
  • Yi WJ, Zhang E, Shen JZ (2014) Vanmanenia maculata, a new species of hillstream loach from the Chang-Jiang Basin, south China (Teleostei: Gastromyzontidae). Zootaxa 3802(1): 085–097. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3801.2.7
  • Yue P, Shan X, Zhang E, Chen J, Luo Y, Chen Y, Lin R, Chu X, Cao W, Tang W, Cai M (2000) Fauna Sinica, Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes III. Science Press, Beijing, China, 661 pp.
  • Zhang CG, Zhao YH (2000) [A new species of the genus Vanmanenia from Guangxi, China. ] Dong Wu Fen Lei Xue Bao—Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 25(4): 458–461. [In Chinese with English abstract]
login to comment