Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Sanny David P. Lumayno ( splumayno@up.edu.ph ) Academic editor: Bakhtiyor Sheraliev
© 2025 Chris Jan P. Dinaga, Ande Bryle N. Genciana, Alan A. Failaman, Maria Alexandra G. Fontanilla, Regie A. Estrada, Emelyn Joy G. Mameloco, Victor Marco Emmanuel N. Ferriols, Rex Ferdinand M. Traifalgar, Sanny David P. Lumayno.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Dinaga CJP, Genciana ABN, Failaman AA, Fontanilla MAG, Estrada RA, Mameloco EJG, Ferriols VMEN, Traifalgar RFM, Lumayno SDP (2025) Feminization of a saline-tolerant tilapia hybrid, UPV SpiN (Oreochromis spilurus × O. niloticus) (Actinopterygii, Cichliformes, Cichlidae) using 17β-Estradiol: Effects of dose and administration method. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 55: 227-235. https://doi.org/10.3897/aiep.55.161420
|
Application of feminization techniques using estrogen hormones can be relevant in cases where there is an insufficient supply of female stock for broodstock production. This study aimed to evaluate the feminization efficiency (FE) of 17β-estradiol (E2) at various concentrations using two different methods applied to the saline-tolerant SpiN (Oreochromis spilurus × O. niloticus) tilapia hybrid developed by the University of the Philippines Visayas (
Dietary supplementation, feminization efficiency, larval with yolk sac immersion, molecular sex markers, Oreochromis spilurus male × O. niloticus female hybrid, sex genotyping
Tilapia aquaculture is a significant industry in the Philippines, with the commodity ranking third in production volume among cultured fishery species (BFAR 2023), and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), being the most dominantly produced species (
Monosex culture is a common practice in tilapia farming to prevent unwanted reproduction and mitigate the negative effects of overstocking, such as disease development, increased competition, and growth regression (
However, a critical component of hatchery operations is the production and rearing of broodstock, which generate new fry for continuous culture. In this context, female tilapia is especially valuable, as fry quality and quantity are largely dependent on female breeders, particularly on indices such as maternal size, gonadosomatic index, and fecundity (
Estrogen hormones used for tilapia feminization include 17β-estradiol (E2), estradiol valerate, and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), with E2 being the most commonly used due to its natural origin and ease of metabolism and excretion (
Specifically, this study aimed to evaluate the feminization efficiency of E2 at different concentrations using two administration methods (dietary supplementation and larval immersion) on the
Swim-up fry and larvae (with yolk-sac) production. Male and female broodstock were randomly selected from the
Feminization through dietary supplementation. Four experimental diets containing increasing levels of E2 were prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of hormone in 200 mL of ethanol per kilogram of feed. The hormone solution was sprayed onto and thoroughly mixed with commercial tilapia fry feed (≥42% crude protein, ≥8% crude fat, =5% crude fiber, =16% crude ash, =12% moisture, =0.25 mm particle size). The treated feed was then sieved and placed in a fume hood to allow ethanol evaporation for at least 72 h before use. The inclusion levels of E2 were as follows: Treatment 1 (control, 0 mg · kg–1), Treatment 2 (50 mg · kg–1), Treatment 3 (100 mg · kg–1), and Treatment 4 (200 mg · kg–1). A total of 480 Day-0 tilapia swim-up fry were randomly distributed into 12 culture tanks (180 L each), with three replicate tanks per treatment and 40 fry per tank. The tanks operated under a flow-through system with a flow rate of 100 mL · min−1. The feeding trial lasted for 28 d. Feeding rates were adjusted weekly based on weight data. Fry were fed ad libitum six times daily from days 0–7. From days 8–14, feeding was 20% of mean body weight (MBW), six times daily. From days 15–28, feeding was reduced to 15% MBW, administered four times daily to match the fry’s growth and feeding efficiency. Daily siphoning and partial water changes were conducted, while water quality parameters (temperature, DO, pH, ammonia, and salinity) were monitored three times per week. During the experimental period, the mean water temperature was 27.84 ± 0.09°C, pH 8.65 ± 0.03, DO 5.62 ± 0.04 ppm, ammonia 0.05 ± 0.01 mg · L–1, and salinity 0.00 ± 0.00 ppt. All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). After the trial, fish from each culture tank were transferred to 1-ton tanks per replicate for grow-out rearing. Salinity was gradually increased at a rate of 2 ppt per day until reaching 20 ppt, and subsequently maintained within the range of 10–20 ppt. A commercial diet (≥28% crude protein, ≥6% crude fat, ≥5% crude fiber, =12% crude ash, =12% moisture, ≥1.50 mm particle size) at ≥3% MBW without hormones was used until the fish reached 100–150 g, at which point, manual phenotypic sex sorting and genotyping were conducted.
Feminization through larval (with yolk-sac) immersion. Five treatments of increasing E2 dosage were set up by mixing the corresponding amount of hormone in plastic containers holding 10 L of freshwater. Concentrations of E2 were: Treatment 1 (control, 0 µg · L–1), Treatment 2 (50 µg · L–1), Treatment 3 (100 µg · L–1), Treatment 4 (200 µg · L–1), and Treatment 5 (400 µg · L–1). To accommodate all treatments with three replicates each, 15 containers were prepared, with 30 larvae with yolk-sac stocked per container, totaling 450 tilapia larvae. The tilapia larvae were immersed for 5 d until the yolk sac was entirely absorbed and were then fed with commercial tilapia fry feed (≥42% crude protein, ≥8% crude fat, =5% crude fiber, =16% crude ash, =12% moisture, =0.25 mm particle size) for about 28 days at ≥15% MBW without hormones. Water quality parameters were not measured; however, daily siphoning and partial water changes were carried out to maintain rearing conditions. To promote faster growth, the tilapia were then transferred to 1-ton tanks each replicate and were fed with a commercial diet (≥28% crude protein, ≥6% crude fat, ≥5% crude fiber, =12% crude ash, =12% moisture, ≥1.50 mm particle size) at ≥3% MBW until the fish reached 100–150 g for manual phenotypic sex sorting and genotyping.
Survival and feminization parameters. The survival rate (SR [%]), phenotypic female ratio (Pfe [%]), and feminization efficiency (FE [%])—also referred to as sex-reversal efficiency or male-to-female conversion rate—were determined using data obtained during sampling. The following formulas were used to calculate these respective indices:
SR = 100(NFF × NIF−1)
P fe = 100(Nfe × NIF−1)
FE = 100(NXYfe × NTXY−1)
where, NIF is initial number of fish, NFF is the final number of fish, Nfe is the total number of phenotypic females, NF is the total number of fish, NXYfe is the number of phenotypic females with XY genotype, and NTXY is the total number of all fish with XY genotype (including phenotypic males).
Sex identification through PCR-based detection of sex-specific genetic markers. Prior to genotypic sex identification, samples were first classified based on external phenotypic sex characteristics. Male tilapia displays two openings located anterior to the anal fin: the anus and a single urogenital pore. In contrast, the female possesses three distinct openings: anus, genital pore, and urinary pore (
Representative examples of the fin excision coding scheme used to uniquely identify
A 10 µL PCR reaction mix was prepared using 1 µL of DNA template (300 ng · µL–1), 5 µL GoTaq® Colorless Master Mix, 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, and 3 µL nuclease-free water. PCR cycling conditions included initial denaturation at 94°C (3 min), 34 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 30 s), annealing (53.8°C, 30 s), extension (72°C, 1.5 min), and final extension at 72°C (10 min). PCR amplicons were separated using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with GelRed, and visualized under a UV Gel Documentation System. This study used the Marker-5 primer set (
Statistical analysis. Data were reported as mean ± SD of the mean. Following the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test to check for the data’s normality and homogeneity of variance, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine, separately, if a significant difference (P < 0.05) exists between treatments of each batch. For significantly different data, Tukey HSD multiple comparison post-hoc test was then conducted to determine which treatments are different.
ARRIVE 2.0 Reporting Compliance. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with the ARRIVE 2.0 (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo experiments) guidelines, which promote transparency, reproducibility, and completeness in reporting animal research methodologies (
AI assistance. Portions of the manuscript, including language and grammar refinement, were revised with the assistance of ChatGPT (OpenAI 2025 version). All intellectual content and analysis remain the responsibility of the authors.
Survival rate and phenotypic female ratio.
In terms of the phenotypic female ratio (Pfe), dietary supplementation of E2 resulted in a significantly higher proportion of females compared to the untreated control (P < 0.05), as shown in Table
Survival rate (SR) [%], and phenotypic female ratio (Pfe) [%] of
| Treatment | Survival rate [%] | Phenotypic female ratio [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0–28 (with E2) | Day 29–75 (no E2) | ||
| 1 (0 mg · kg–1) | 100 ± 0.00a | 99.17 ± 0.58a | 49.44 ± 16.51a |
| 2 (50 mg · kg–1) | 99.17 ± 1.44a | 96.64 ± 1.53a | 97.94 ± 1.79b |
| 3 (100 mg · kg–1) | 99.17 ± 1.44a | 98.33 ± 1.15a | 97.28 ± 2.58b |
| 4 (200 mg · kg–1) | 100 ± 0.00a | 100 ± 0.00a | 93.97 ± 6.44b |
Similarly,
However, in terms of the Pfe, the treated groups (Treatments 2–5) did not differ significantly from the control (Treatment 1), even at the highest observed value of 72.84% in Treatment 2 (Table
Survival rate (SR) [%], and phenotypic female ratio (Pfe) [%] of
| Treatment | Survival rate [%] | Phenotypic female ratio [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1–5 (with E2) | Day 6–60 (no E2) | ||
| 1 (0 µg · L–1) | 100 ± 0.00 | 98.89 ± 1.92 | 65.91 ± 13.82 |
| 2 (50 µg · L–1) | 98.89 ± 1.92 | 98.89 ± 1.92 | 72.84 ± 10.90 |
| 3 (100 µg · L–1) | 97.78 ± 1.92 | 97.78 ± 1.92 | 64.00 ± 12.17 |
| 4 (200 µg · L–1) | 85.56 ± 13.47 | 83.33 ± 17.32 | 69.62 ± 11.36 |
| 5 (400 µg · L–1) | 95.56 ± 5.09 | 93.33 ± 5.77 | 71.02 ± 1.63 |
Sex identification through PCR-based detection of sex-specific genetic markers and feminization efficiency [%]. Sex identification was performed using PCR amplification targeting sex-specific genetic markers, which successfully produced two distinct bands: as shown in Figs
Representative PCR products from the feminization experiment of
As shown in Table
Phenotypic sex ratios and feminization efficiency (FE) of
| Treatment | Replicates | Initial sample size | Survival count (at the time of PCR) | Phenotypic male number | Phenotypic female number | Female survival count (at the time of PCR) | Phenotypic female with XY genotype | Feminization efficiency [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (0 mg · kg–1) | 1 | 40 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 47 | — | — |
| 2 | 40 | 37 | 12 | 25 | ||||
| 3 | 40 | 34 | 22 | 12 | ||||
| 2 (50 mg · kg–1) | 1 | 40 | 34 | 1 | 33 | 88 | 36 | 94.74 |
| 2 | 40 | 29 | 0 | 29 | ||||
| 3 | 40 | 31 | 1 | 30 | ||||
| 3 (100 mg · kg–1) | 1 | 40 | 33 | 1 | 32 | 100 | 60 | 95.24 |
| 2 | 40 | 35 | 0 | 35 | ||||
| 3 | 40 | 39 | 2 | 37 | ||||
| 4 (200 mg · kg–1) | 1 | 40 | 39 | 5 | 34 | 101 | 55 | 88.71 |
| 2 | 40 | 38 | 2 | 36 | ||||
| 3 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 40 |
In contrast to the other hormone administration method, feminization via the larval (yolk-sac) immersion approach showed limited success, with only a few XY individuals exhibiting phenotypic sex reversal (Fig.
Phenotypic sex ratios and feminization efficiency (FE) of
| Treatment | Replicates | Initial sample size | Survival count (at the time of PCR) | Phenotypic male number | Phenotypic female number | Female survival count (at the time of PCR) | Phenotypic female with XY genotype | Feminization efficiency [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (0 µg · L–1) | 1 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 46 | — | — |
| 2 | 30 | 18 | 9 | 9 | ||||
| 3 | 30 | 28 | 7 | 21 | ||||
| 2 (50 µg · L–1) | 1 | 30 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 54 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 30 | 25 | 6 | 19 | ||||
| 3 | 30 | 22 | 4 | 18 | ||||
| 3 (100 µg · L–1) | 1 | 30 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 44 | 5 | 16.67 |
| 2 | 30 | 20 | 6 | 14 | ||||
| 3 | 30 | 25 | 7 | 18 | ||||
| 4 (200 µg · L–1) | 1 | 30 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 46 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 30 | 23 | 4 | 19 | ||||
| 3 | 30 | 26 | 10 | 16 | ||||
| 5 (400 µg · L–1) | 1 | 30 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 54 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 30 | 21 | 6 | 15 | ||||
| 3 | 30 | 29 | 8 | 21 |
The presently reported study demonstrated that dietary supplementation of E2 is an effective method for inducing feminization in the saline-tolerant
Among the dietary treatments, FE was highest at 100 mg · kg–1 (95.24%), indicating that a large proportion of genetic males were successfully feminized. The treatment with 50 mg · kg–1 also showed a high FE of 94.74%, while 200 mg kg−1 did not result in further improvement. These results suggest that 100 mg · kg–1 is an optimal dose, achieving high feminization while avoiding unnecessary excess hormone use. This plateau in response aligns with findings in other fish species, such as Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters, 1852) (see
This finding contrasts with previous studies, such as
While phenotypic sex assessment is practical, it can sometimes be confounded by ambiguous external characteristics or developmental variability, leading to potential misclassification (
PCR-based sex identification confirmed the successful conversion of genetic males into phenotypic females, validating the reliability of the feminization protocol. Given the saline tolerance of the
We gratefully acknowledge the research funding support of the Department of Science and Technology – Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development. We also thank the individuals involved in the phenotypic sex sorting, particularly John Michael Moleta, Reynaldo Nuñeza, and Ryan Pagsugiron. We also acknowledge the
Sixty-three unique dorsal fin clipping codes generated from selective removal of the first six dorsal spines in
Data type: pdf
Explanation note: Each pattern represents a distinct temporary identification code for individual fish.