Research Article
Print
Research Article
Impacts of invasive alien fish species— Micropterus salmoides and Lepomis macrochirus (Actinopterygii, Centrarchiformes, Centrarchidae)—on freshwater fish communities in lakes and reservoirs of Korea: A five-year monitoring study
expand article infoYun Jeong Cho, Jong-Wook Kim§, Cheol-Woo Park§, Soo In Lee, Jae-Goo Kim§
‡ National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon, Republic of Korea
§ Alpha Research Ecology Institute, Gunsan, Republic of Korea
Open Access

Abstract

Invasive alien fish species, such as the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède, 1802), and bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819, have rapidly spread across freshwater ecosystems in Korea, raising serious ecological threats. This study investigated the impact of these invasive alien species on fish communities in large lakes and small reservoirs over a 5-year monitoring period (2019–2023). Eight sites, including four lakes and four reservoirs, were surveyed twice a year. Fish were collected using cast nets, kick nets, and gillnets (for lakes). Species diversity indices (Shannon’s Hʹ, Pielou’s Jʹ, and Margalef richness) and dominance indices were calculated. Poisson-based analysis of variance models was applied to examine the relationship between the densities of invasive alien species and the diversity of fish communities. Sites with higher densities of largemouth bass and bluegill had significantly lower diversity indices. Non-metric multidimensional scaling analyses indicated distinct community groupings according to the type of waterbody and the presence of invasive alien species. These results emphasize the need for continued monitoring and management strategies tailored to different habitat scales.

Keywords

invasive alien species, Lepomis macrochirus, Micropterus salmoides, aquatic ecosystems, Long-term monitoring, closed waterbodies

Introduction

The growth of international trade and industrial development has resulted in an increase in the influx of alien species (Bellard et al. 2013; ME 2006). According to the Global Invasive Species Program, there are four types of introduction pathways of alien species: intentional, accidental, contained, and post-introduction spread via vectors. In Korea, the majority of alien species have been intentionally introduced for purposes such as agriculture, ornamental use, and the pet trade, although some cases have involved unintentional or contained introductions (Bang et al. 2004). Among alien species, fish are often deliberately introduced for fisheries and biological control. Nevertheless, unintentional introductions have also occurred due to the escape of farmed individuals, released pets, or mixing during the release of other fish species. In Korea, both intentional and unintentional introductions appear to be the major pathways for the invasion of alien fish species. The introduction of such alien species can result in both ecological and economic damage; in fact, it has been reported that the global economic loss due to the spread of alien species amounts to approximately 530 trillion KRW annually (IPBES 2023). Moreover, invasive alien species are among the most significant direct drivers of global biodiversity loss. In particular, biological diversity has been significantly altered in freshwater ecosystems by invasive alien species over the past 50–100 years, with their impact on biodiversity intensifying continuously (IPBES 2023). As per the most recent national survey, 2653 alien species have been identified in Korea, showing a steady increase from 894 species recorded in 2009 (NIE 2021). Among them, alien fish accounted for 879 species (NIE 2023), comprising 33.13% of all recorded alien species.

In Korea, the most prominent invasive alien fish species are the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède, 1802), and bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819. The largemouth bass is a species native to the southeastern United States. It was introduced to Korea from North America in 1973 to improve fishery resources, being first released into Cheorwon and Lake Paldang, after which it spread through rivers and reservoirs throughout the country. The bluegill, also native to the southeastern United States and belonging to the same family, was introduced to Korea from Japan in 1969 for the same purpose, after which it spread to rivers and lakes nationwide.

Aquatic ecosystems are relatively enclosed systems that are particularly vulnerable to disruption caused by the introduction of alien species (Strayer 2010). As invasive alien species, fish occupy the higher trophic levels in ecosystems and induce more profound changes than other taxonomic groups (Orians 1995; Strayer 2010). Moreover, alien fish may compete with native fish species and alter the food web, potentially affecting water quality and nutrient cycling (Gallardo et al. 2015). In particular, the introduction of novel predators exerts the greatest impact on native benthic invertebrates (Gallardo et al. 2015).

The largemouth bass reduces fish species diversity in invaded ecosystems and modifies food web structure (Carpenter and Kitchell 1993; Takaharu et al. 2015). Due to its generalist feeding habits and behavior of guarding spawning grounds, it often becomes an apex predator in aquatic ecosystems (Hill and Cichra 2005; Almeida et al. 2012), exerting significant negative effects on reservoirs and rivers (Ko et al. 2008). Bluegills are omnivorous and feed on both plant and animal material; however, they often exhibit a preference for animal prey, depending on the environment. Their broad diet and rapid population growth pose a threat to invertebrate and fish communities (Song et al. 2012). Consequently, both the largemouth bass and bluegill have been designated as ecosystem-disturbing species under the Natural Environment Conservation Act since 1998 (Act on the Conservation and Use of Biological Diversity, Article 21-2, Risk Assessment) and are subject to management in Korea (NIE 2021; ME 2024).

Freshwater ecosystems are typically classified into lotic systems, such as rivers, and lentic systems, such as lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands. Unlike rivers, lakes and reservoirs exhibit stagnant water with minimal flow and generally support a single stable community structure (Dobson and Frid 2009). Over time, fish species inhabiting lentic environments develop species-specific ecological and physiological strategies that allow them to adapt to these conditions and maintain their populations (Kim et al. 2005). Nevertheless, in such single-community lentic systems, the introduction of alien species can cause a decline in biodiversity (Vitousek et al. 1996), and studies have also reported a significant reduction in fish species diversity in lakes and reservoirs invaded by alien species (Maezono and Miyashita 2003; Maezono et al. 2005). The impact of alien species may vary depending on the size of the reservoir. In small lakes with relatively low ecological complexity, there is limited available space, resources are scarce, and native fish communities are more vulnerable to disruption. In contrast, large lakes with greater ecological complexity and more available habitats may buffer the spread of alien species to some extent.

Therefore, this study focused on assessing the relative abundance and community structure of fish communities in lakes colonized by invasive alien species, namely bluegill and largemouth bass, based on 5 years of monitoring data from large and small lakes. The outcomes of this research may support management strategies that aim to maintain balanced fish communities by regulating populations of these species.

Materials and methods

Fish monitoring was conducted twice annually (in summer and autumn) from 2019 to 2023 at eight sites where largemouth bass and bluegill were present. These sites included four lakes—Lake Chuncheon, Lake Chungju, Lake Daecheong, and Lake Jangseong—and four reservoirs—Susim, Gangjeong, Buckchosan, and Gwanglyeong (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Map showing the eight study sites located in South Korea. A. Lake Chuncheon, B. Lake Chungju, C. Lake Daecheong, D. Lake Jangseong, E. Gangjeong Reservoir, F. Buckchosan Reservoir, G. Susim Reservoir, H. Gwanglyeong Reservoir.

Cast nets (mesh size: 5 × 5 mm) and kick nets (mesh size: 4 × 4 mm) were used to evaluate the fish fauna at each site. Furthermore, in the four large lakes, gill nets (4- and 12-panel types, each 50 m in length) were set for more than 12 h and then retrieved. Cast nets were thrown at least 10 times per site, and kick netting was conducted for 40 min. All captured fish were identified and counted on-site. Native fish were released back into the habitat after identification, excluding the invasive alien species. The relative abundance of each species was calculated to compare fish assemblages among the sites. Community structure was analyzed using indices of species diversity, evenness, and richness.

Species diversity was calculated using the Shannon–Wiener index (Pielou 1969):

H'=i=1sniNlnniN

where S is the total number of species, ni is the number of individuals of species i among the collected individuals, and N is the total number of individuals collected.

Evenness was estimated with Pielou’s evenness index (Pielou 1975):

J'=H'ln(S)

which expresses the ratio of observed diversity to the maximum possible diversity.

Species richness was evaluated using Margalef’s richness index (RI) (Margalef 1958):

RI=(S-1)ln(N)

where N is the total number of individuals in the sample.

The effect of the relative abundance of largemouth bass and bluegill on fish species diversity was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using R (ver. 4.4.2) based on the Poisson distribution. ANOVA was conducted using the aov function with the specified Poisson family, and the Type II sum of squares was applied using the car package (ver. 3; Fox and Weisberg 2019). For post hoc analysis, the emmeans package (ver. 1.10.7; Russell et al. 2021) was used for comparing pairwise mean differences, and Tukey’s HSD was applied for identifying statistically significant group differences. The relationship between sampling sites and fish assemblages was further analyzed using non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) with the metaMDS function from the vegan package (ver. 2.6-10; Oksanen et al. 2025) in R (ver. 4.4.2). Dissimilarity among sites was evaluated using the Bray–Curtis distance. The ordination results were interpreted based on the stress value, where values < 0.2 indicate acceptable ordination and values < 0.05 indicate excellent fit (Clarke and Warwick 1994).

Results

Over the 5-year monitoring period, 9105 individual fish representing 41 species from 11 families were collected from the four lake sites, with the invasive alien species bluegill and largemouth bass accounting for 3947 individuals (a relative abundance of 43.35%; Table 1). Among the lakes, Lake Chuncheon exhibited the highest relative abundance (72.98%; 1383 individuals) and the greatest species richness (27 species). Bluegill and largemouth bass were consistently dominant in Lake Chuncheon, resulting in elevated dominance values and a corresponding decline in evenness. In Lake Chungju, bluegill remained a persistent subdominant species, although cyprinids, such as Coreoperca herzi Herzenstein, 1896, were also abundant, resulting in a slightly different community structure.

Table 1.

Fish assemblage data year and lakes in South Korea, 2019–2023.

Species Lakes at the study site
Chuncheon Chungju Daecheong Jangseong
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Order Cypriniformes
Family Cyprinidae
Cyprinus carpio 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 2 5 1 3
Carassius auratus 4 17 3 9 3 3 7 2 7 10 11 5 1 43 18 11 27 33 54
Carassius cuvieri 4 1 4 2 1 15 4 2
Acheilognathus lanceolata intermedia 1 14 1 15 18
Acheilognathus yamatsutae 9 22 2
Acanthorhodeus chankaensis 29
Pseudorasbora parva 3 4 2 2
Pseudopungtungia nigra▲● 1
Pungtungia herzi 1 2 11 1 2
Sarcocheilichthys variegatus wakiyae* 1
Sarcocheilichthys nigripinnis morii* 3 3
Squalidus japonicus coreanus* 3 4 2
Squalidus chankaensis tsuchigae* 8 3 2 78 25 24 11 13 12 115 36 49
Hemibarbus labeo 10 9 42 17 15 1 8 3 34 7 4 94 41 18 42
Hemibarbus longirostris 2 4
Pseudogobio esocinus 9 6 5 7 22 1 9 8 10 4 105 7 5 1
Microphysogobio yaluensis* 1
Zacco temminckii 2
Zacco koreanus* 4
Zacco platypus 9 14 2 5 8 35 31 6 35 11 29 1 7 6 8 16 9 21 5
Opsariichthys uncirostris amurensis 4 21 2 7 2 1 15 30
Squaliobarbus curriculus 66 1 1
Erythroculter erythropterus 2 10 15
Hemiculter eigenmanni 4 139 115 297 191 73 469 175 79 238 44 280 153 375 237 137
Family Cobitidae
Iksookimia hugowolfeldi* 2 2
Cobitis nalbanti* 6 2
Order Siluriformes
Family Bagridae
Pseudobagrus fulvidraco 4 1 1 1 4
Family Siluridae
Silurus asotus 1
Order Osmeriformes
Family Osmeridae
Hypomesus nipponensis 7 1 3 166 4 1 1 5 1 2
Plecoglossus altivelis 3
Order Salmoniformes
Family Salmonidae
Oncorhynchus masou 1
Order Perciformes
Family Centropomidae
Siniperca scherzeri 4 2 3 2 3 3 1 2 1
Coreoperca herzi* 6
Family Centrarchidae
Lepomis macrochirus 206 287 60 159 126 20 166 126 79 62 137 365 74 37 137 145 339 161 297 51
Micropterus salmoides 136 89 50 106 164 1 23 24 2 20 34 14 15 9 14 50 30 101 31
Family Odontobutidae
Odontobutis platycephala* 1 1 1 1
Odontobutis interrupta* 2 2
Family Gobiidae
Gymnogobius urotaenia 1
Rhinogobius giurinus 2 2
Tridentiger brevispinis 1 7 23 2 1 1 1
Family Channidae
Channa argus 1 1 1 1
Total individuals 398 448 188 477 384 239 354 469 448 187 759 737 280 375 358 503 805 652 750 294
Total species 12 16 12 10 16 13 10 9 12 12 13 12 13 13 18 12 13 12 12 11
Shannon’s Diversity Index (Hʹ) 1.28 1.24 1.69 1.46 1.64 1.44 1.37 1.02 1.70 1.64 1.23 1.48 1.87 1.44 2.00 1.28 1.64 1.27 1.51 1.53
Pielou’s Evenness (Jʹ) 0.51 0.45 0.68 0.63 0.59 0.56 0.59 0.46 0.68 0.66 0.48 0.59 0.73 0.56 0.69 0.51 0.64 0.51 0.61 0.64
Simpson’s Dominance Index (λ) 0.86 0.84 0.59 0.68 0.76 0.73 0.79 0.90 0.60 0.72 0.80 0.73 0.55 0.73 0.51 0.84 0.61 0.82 0.71 0.65
Species richeness (RI) 1.84 2.46 2.10 1.46 2.52 2.19 1.53 1.30 1.80 2.10 1.81 1.67 2.13 2.02 2.89 1.77 1.79 1.70 1.66 1.76

In Lake Daecheong, the abundance of invasive alien species declined in 2023 compared with earlier years; however, their relative abundance still reached 40.78%. As 18 species were present, both the diversity index and species richness were the highest among the four lakes. Lake Jangseong also exhibited a lower proportion of invasive alien species in 2023; however, the small number of species collected implied that the richness and diversity indices were only minimally affected.

Bluegill was predominant in the four reservoirs (Table 2). In Gangjeong, only bluegill was recorded, although the overall abundance was comparatively low. In Buckchosan, largemouth bass was dominant until 2020; however, after a complete removal project, no invasive alien species were detected, resulting in increases in diversity and richness. In Susim, only largemouth bass was observed, although 1780 individuals representing 20 species were captured; hence, the dominance values were low. In contrast, both largemouth bass and bluegill were detected in Gwanglyeong, and these two species were also found for several years in this reservoir, indicating a marked community imbalance. Across the lakes, C. herzi and bluegill were typically dominant or subdominant, whereas in the reservoirs, C. herzi, bluegill, largemouth bass, and the goby, Rhinogobius brunneus (Temminck et Schlegel, 1845), were frequently dominant or subdominant (Table 3).

Table 2.

Fish assemblage data from reservoirs in South Korea, 2019–2023.

Species Reservoirs at the study site
Gangjeong Buckchosan Susim Gwanglyeong
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Order Cypriniformes
Family Cyprinidae
Cyprinus carpio 1 6 2 4 10 6
Carassius auratus 7 3 13 21 30 87 4 26 10 11 87 7
Carassius cuvieri 1
Ctenopharyngodon idellus 1
Acheilognathus lanceolata intermedia 2
Pseudorasbora parva 8 8 14 70 47 10 48 1
Squalidus japonicus coreanus* 11 1
Squalidus chankaensis tsuchigae* 1 6
Hemibarbus labeo 1 1
Abbottina rivularis 4
Microphysogobio jeoni* 11 89
Aphyocypris chinensis 1
Zacco platypus 1
Opsariichthys uncirostris amurensis 1 7
Squaliobarbus curriculus 6 16 13 32 89 42 116 47
Erythroculter erythropterus 1 18 10 48 46 39 127
Hemiculter eigenmanni 59 41 28 83 77 138 29 66 23
Family Cobitidae
Misgurnus anguillicaudatus 11 16 20 1 1 1
Misgurnus mizolepis 1
Order Siluriformes
Family Bagridae
Pseudobagrus fulvidraco 1 1 1
Family Siluridae
Silurus asotus 1
Order Beloniformes
Family Adrianichthyidae
Oryzias sinensis 126 205 205
Oreder Synbranchiformes
Family Synbranchidae
Monopterus albus 1 1 1
Order Perciformes
Family Centrarchidae
Lepomis macrochirus 1 791 188 294 206
Micropterus salmoides 19 20 9 20 37 40 143 69 50 19 29 204 11 46 165 66
Family Odontobutidae
Micropercops swinhonis 9 3 1
Family Gobiidae
Rhinogobius giurinus 3 30 21 44 127 145 135 1 1 135
Tridentiger brevispinis 9 43 1 11 46
Family Channidae
Channa argus 1 1 1
Total individuals 98 113 89 207 256 65 189 148 302 429 438 243 278 392 429 995 199 354 373 66
Total species 8 8 7 8 14 4 2 2 4 5 10 8 11 15 5 2 2 5 4 1
Shannon’s Diversity Index (Hʹ) 1.25 1.70 1.55 1.71 2.03 0.99 0.55 0.41 0.97 1.07 1.75 1.82 1.65 1.88 1.07 0.51 0.21 0.58 0.72 0.00
Pielou’s Evenness (Jʹ) 0.60 0.82 0.80 0.82 0.77 0.71 0.80 0.59 0.70 0.66 0.76 0.87 0.69 0.70 0.66 0.73 0.31 0.36 0.52
Simpson’s Dominance Index (λ) 0.80 0.54 0.65 0.61 0.47 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.79 0.52 0.40 0.65 0.55 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.99
Species richness (RI) 1.53 1.48 1.34 1.31 2.34 0.72 0.19 0.20 0.53 0.66 1.48 1.27 1.78 2.34 0.66 0.14 0.19 0.68 0.51 0.00
Table 3.

Fish community characteristics in the study sites in South Korea.

Factor Lake Reservoir
Chuncheon Chungju Daecheong Jangseong Gangjeong Buckchosan Susim Gwanglyeong
N 1895 1697 2509 3004 763 1133 1780 1987
S 27 19 23 21 20 8 20 7
D L. macrochirus H. eigenmanni H. eigenmanni H. eigenmanni H. eigenmanni R. giurinus S. curriculus L. macrochirus
RA [%] 44.22 48.03 40.06 39.35 37.75 35.92 16.52 74.43
B M. salmoides L. macrochirus L. macrochirus L. macrochirus M. salmoides O. sinensis E. erythropterus M. salmoides
RA [%] 28.76 26.69 29.89 33.06 13.76 29.21 14.61 24.76
N I 1383 503 842 1219 105 184 167 1,971
RA [%] 72.98 29.64 33.56 40.58 13.76 16.24 9.38 99.19
ENs 8 2 2 5 2 0 3 0
ER [%] 29.6 10.5 8.7 23.8 10.0 0 15.0 0

Korean endemic species were collected in Chuncheon (8 species, mean endemic rate 29.6%), Chungju (2 species, 10.5%), Daecheong (2 species, 8.7%), Jangseong (5 species, 23.8%), Gangjeong (2 species, 10.0%), and Susim (3 species, 15.0%), but were not observed in Buckchosan or Gwanglyeong (Tables 2, 3). In addition, the endangered species, Pseudopungtungia nigra Mori, 1935, was captured once in Chuncheon in 2019 but has not been recorded thereafter.

nMDS analysis of fish communities and largemouth bass/bluegill densities revealed that all sites contained invasive alien species (Tables 1, 2; Fig. 2). Among the lakes, Lake Chuncheon had the highest proportion of invasive alien species (72.98%), whereas among the reservoirs, Gwanglyeong showed 99.19% (Table 3). Bluegill was dominant in the lakes, whereas largemouth bass was dominant in the reservoirs (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

Density of Micropterus salmoides (A) and Lepomis macrochirus (B) at the study sites in South Korea during the monitoring period.

A Type II Poisson-based ANOVA revealed that the density of both largemouth bass and bluegill significantly affected species diversity (Table 4). Largemouth bass density exerted a significant effect on diversity (F1, 38 = 8.58, P = 0.0057), and bluegill density exerted a very strong effect (F1, 38 = 21.02, P < 0.0001), and the interaction between them was also significant (F1, 38 = 14.87, P < 0.001). Neither lake size nor its interactions with largemouth bass or bluegill density significantly affected diversity (P > 0.05), and the largemouth bass × lake size interaction was similarly nonsignificant (P > 0.05).

Table 4.

ANOVA results using the Poisson distribution (Type II tests; response: Shannon index) in the study site in South Korea.

Sum DF F value Pr(>F)
Largemouth bass density 1.1041 1 8.5795 0.005720
Bluegill density 2.7050 1 21.0195 4.814e-05
Lake type 1.9142 1 14.8740 0.000431
largemouth bass density:Bluegill density 0.0634 1 0.4924 0.487138
largemouth bass denstiy:Lake type 0.0666 1 0.5176 0.476248
Bluegill density:Lake type 0.3520 1 2.7349 0.106420
largemouth bass density:Bluegill density:Lake type 0.2125 1 1.6512 0.206579
Residuals 4.8903 38

The nMDS ordination further revealed distinct clustering of communities according to waterbody size (lakes vs. reservoirs; Fig. 3), confirming size-related differences in fish assemblages. Buckchosan plotted separately from the other reservoirs, indicating community shifts after the complete removal of largemouth bass in 2020.

Figure 3. 

Ordination plots of fish species from four lakes and four reservoirs, in South Korea, based on non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS; stress value = 0.18).

Discussion

Largemouth bass and bluegill have been introduced to improve fishery resources in several countries. Similarly, they were introduced to Korea to address food shortages and improve fish stocks. Since their introduction, both species have adapted to and spread across most rivers and reservoirs, causing ecological disturbances. Largemouth bass are now widely distributed throughout the country, including Jeju Island, and are especially abundant in the main river channels, with higher densities typically observed in low-gradient rivers (Kim and An 2021). Largemouth bass prefer lentic habitats with slow or stagnant water flow (Lee et al. 2009). Similarly, bluegill prefer slow-flowing environments and are now widely distributed across rivers and reservoirs in Korea, with particularly high occupancy rates in weedy dam lakes and reservoirs (Son and Song 2006). This indicates differences in microhabitat between the two species.

In the presently reported study, bluegills were largely absent from reservoirs, except for one individual in Buckchosan and a few individuals in Gwanglyeong. However, their abundance was high in larger lakes, exhibiting a distinct distribution pattern compared with that of largemouth bass, which were present at all sampling sites. Lake Chuncheon had the highest number of species and the highest proportion of invasive alien species (72.98%). In contrast, the other lake sites (Chungju, Daecheong, and Jangseong) exhibited lower relative abundances of invasive alien species (29.64%, 33.56%, and 40.58%, respectively). In reservoirs, except for Gwanglyeong (99.19%), the relative abundance of invasive alien species was lower, ranging from 9.38% to 16.24%, indicating a generally lower load of invasive alien species than that in lakes.

These differences can be attributed to several factors. First, the sampling methods differed between lakes and reservoirs. Cast nets and kick nets used in lakes have limitations, especially in deeper waters; hence, gill nets were also deployed, which were particularly effective in collecting species such as largemouth bass and bluegill that were active at depths of 2–3 m. Second, lakes may have been prioritized earlier in fishery improvement projects, resulting in earlier and more extensive introduction of invasive alien species, which are now reaching ecological saturation. In contrast, most reservoirs have been established for agricultural purposes and may have experienced a delayed introduction of invasive species. For instance, in Buckchosan, largemouth bass was dominant until 2020 (relative abundance 63.08%–75.66%); however, after a complete removal project, no invasive alien species have been observed since 2021, resulting in an overall decrease in their 5-year cumulative abundance. In Gwanglyeong, only a few individuals of native species, such as carp Cyprinus carpio, crucian carp, Carassius Carassius (Linnaeus, 1758), topmouth gudgeon, Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck et Schlegel, 1846), and northern snakehead, Channa argus (Cantor, 1842), were recorded, whereas most captured fish were invasive alien species, indicating a severely degraded fish community.

The analysis of largemouth bass and bluegill densities in lakes and reservoirs revealed that both species were significantly negatively correlated with fish species diversity. These results are consistent with those of Lee et al. (2020), who reported that the abundances of largemouth bass and bluegill significantly and negatively correlated with the total abundance of native fish. This suggests that increased densities of invasive alien species correspond to decreased species diversity. Because diversity reflects both species richness and evenness, the dominance of invasive alien species implies a decline in ecosystem health and stability. Largemouth bass feed on aquatic insects, fish, and shrimp, and those inhabiting lakes primarily prey on fish (Ko et al. 2008; Park et al. 2019). Bluegills are omnivorous and feed on both plant material and animal prey; however, in introduced habitats, they tend to prefer animal prey and feed on aquatic invertebrates, small fish, and fish eggs (Mittelbach 1984; Azuma 1992). At invaded sites, both species probably caused declines in the abundance of native species through direct predation and competition for food and habitat, leading to reduced species richness and abundance.

It has been almost 50 years since the introduction of largemouth bass and bluegill into the freshwater ecosystems of Korea, and numerous studies continue to report their negative impacts on fish communities, native species, and endemic fauna. According to Kim (1997), the average percentage of endemic species in Korea is 25.9%. Compared with this value, all study sites exhibited lower proportions, except for Chuncheon (29.6%). Therefore, it is important to develop ongoing strategies and conduct consistent monitoring to protect and restore river ecosystems. The presently reported study was conducted in lakes and reservoirs within the Hangang, Geumgang, and Yeongsangang River basins; therefore, some variability may exist in other watersheds, such as the Nakdonggang and Seomjingang river systems. Moreover, because of the relatively small number of study sites, it is necessary to expand the number of sampling locations to ensure more robust conclusions. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable long-term monitoring data on invasive alien species in lakes and reservoirs over 5 years and may serve as a foundational resource for the future management of invasive alien species and the development of policies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Environment Research (NIE) of the Republic of Korea (NIE-A-2025-09).

References

  • Almeida D, Almodóvar A, Nicola GG, Elvira B, Grossman GD (2012) Trophic plasticity of invasive juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in Iberian streams. Fisheries Research 113(1): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.11.002
  • Bang SW, Kim MH, No TH (2004) Development of integrated management plan for abating the threats from invasive alien species in Korea. Korea Environment Institute, Korea.
  • Bellard C, Thuiller W, Leroy B, Genovesi P, Bakkenes M, Courchamp F (2013) Will climate change promote future invasions? Global Change Biology 19(12): 3740–3748. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12344
  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Changes in marine communities: An approach to statistical analyses and interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, Plymouth.
  • Dobson M, Frid C (2009) Ecology of aquatic system. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 321 pp.
  • Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sánchez MI, Vilà M (2015) Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global Change Biology 22(1): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13004
  • Hill JE, Cichra CE (2005) Biological synopsis of five selected Florida centrarchid fishes with an emphasis on the effects of water level fluctuations. Water Supply Management Division St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Florida, 136 pp.
  • IPBES (2023) Summary for policymakers of the thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services.
  • Kim CH, Lee WO, Lee JK, Hong KE (2005) [The ichthyofauna in Lake Cheongpyeong Korea. ] Korean Journal of Ichthyology 17(2): 123–130. [In Korean]
  • Kim IS (1997) [Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea. Vol. 37. Freshwater fishes.] Ministry of Education, Yeongi, Korea. [In Korean]
  • Kim JE, An KG (2021) Long-term distribution trend analysis of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), based on National Fish Database, and the ecological risk assessments. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 39(2): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2021.39.2.207
  • Ko MH, Park JY, Lee YJ (2008) [Feeding habits of an introduced largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Perciformes; Centrachidae), and its influence on ichthyofauna in the lake Okjeong, Korea. ] Korean Journal of Ichthyology 20: 36–44. [In Korean]
  • Lee DS, Lee DY, Ji CW, Kwak IS, Hwang SJ, Lee HJ, Park YS (2020) [Impacts of introduced fishes (Carassius cuvieri, Micropterus salmoides, Lepomis macrochirus) on stream fish communities in South Korea. ] Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 53(3): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2020.53.3.241 [In Korean]
  • Lee WO, Yang H, Yoon SW, Park JY (2009) [Study on the feeding habits of Micropterus salmoides in Lake Okjeong and Lake Yongdam, Korea. ] Korean Journal of Ichthyology 21: 200–207. [In Korean]
  • Maezono Y, Kobayashi R, Kusahara M, Miyashita T (2005) Direct and indirect effects of exotic bass and bluegill on exotic and native organisms in farm pond. Ecological Applications 15: 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5386
  • Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. General Systems 3: 36–71.
  • Ministry of Environment (ME) (2006) Research for classification of ecosystem risk level, and current state of introduced species in Korea. ME, Sejong, Korea.
  • NIE (2021) [Guidebook for national inhabitants’ survey of alien species.] National Institute of Ecology, NIE, Seocheon, Korea. [In Korean]
  • NIE (2023) [Nationwide survey of non-native species in Korea.] National Institute of Ecology, 197–242. NIE, Seocheon, Korea. [In Korean]
  • Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J, Borman T (2025) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6-10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  • Park JS, Kim SH, Kim HT, Kim JG, Park JY, Kim HS (2019) [Study on feeding habits of Micropterus salmoides in habitat types from Korea. ] Korean Journal of Ichthyology 31: 39–53. [In Korean] https://doi.org/10.35399/ISK.31.1.6
  • Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 286 pp.
  • Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York, 165 pp.
  • Son YM, Song HB (2006) [Geumgang (river) freshwater fish.] Jisung Company, Seoul. [In Korean]
  • Song HB, Byeon MS, Kang DW, Jang CR, Moon JS, Park HK (2012) [Population structure of Bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus in lakes of the Han River system, Korea. ] Korean Journal of Ichthyology 24(4): 278–286. [In Korean]
  • Takaharu N, Takamura N, Nakagawa M, Kadono Y, Tanaka T, Mitsuhashi H (2015) Environmental and biotic characteristics to discriminate farm ponds with and without exotic largemouth bass and bluegill in western Japan. Limnology 16: 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-015-0453-8
  • Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Science 84: 468–477.
login to comment