Research Article
Print
Research Article
Molecular identification and morphological description of a Neoclinus chihiroe (Actinopterygii, Blenniiformes, Chaenopsidae) larva from the East Sea, Korea
expand article infoHyuck Joon Kwun
‡ National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon-gun, Republic of Korea
Open Access

Abstract

A single specimen of Neoclinus (family Chaenopsidae) was collected from the East Sea, Korea, in June 2016.This is the first report of the larval stage of Neoclinus chihiroe Fukao, 1987. The lack of distinctive morphological features in fish larvae makes species identification difficult; however, the species was identified through DNA barcoding. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I revealed that the larval specimen corresponds to an adult of N. chihiroe reported from Korea in 2021. Morphologically, the larval specimen of N. chihiroe is characterized by the posterior tip of the maxilla being located below the middle of the eye, two multifid cirri on the orbit, dorsal fin with 13 spines and 15 soft rays, anal fin with 2 spines and 27 soft rays, and 13 pectoral fin rays. In the pigmentation pattern, there are three pairs of melanophores on the top of the head (one pair in each of the interorbital, occipital, and nape regions), several melanophores in a row from the isthmus to the anus, six pale melanophores on both sides of the dorsal contour, and many melanophores along the ventral contour on the anal fin base.

Keywords

larval fish, Neoclinus chihiroe, DNA barcoding, identification, East Sea

Introduction

Accurate identification of fish larvae is important and essential for understanding early life history and ecology and supports biodiversity research (Smith et al. 2018; Marancik et al. 2020; Appleyard et al. 2022). However, identifying fish larvae is very difficult because of a lack of diagnostic morphological characters or their shape information is unknown (Hulley et al. 2018; Pozzobon et al. 2024). Therefore, recent research on larval fish identification has incorporated both morphological and genetic analyses (Ko et al. 2013; Azmir et al. 2017; Xing et al. 2022).

The fringehead genus Neoclinus Girard, 1858 (family Chaenopsidae) consists of benthic marine fishes that inhabit rocky near shore areas or areas with a sandy bottom below the low tide line (Froese and Pauly 2025). Eleven species of the genus occur in coastal areas of the Pacific Ocean (Hubbs 1953; Murase et al. 2010), of which eight species occur on the western side of the ocean and three on the eastern side. Of the eight western species, four have been reported from Korea (Myoung and Kwun 2022): Neoclinus bryope (Jordan et Snyder, 1902), Neoclinus chihiroe Fukao, 1987, Neoclinus lacunicola Fukao, 1980, and Neoclinus nudiceps Murase, Aizawa et Sunobe, 2010. Research on this genus has consisted mostly of taxonomic reviews, descriptions of new species, and documentation of distribution patterns (Jordan and Snyder 1902; Hubbs 1953; Fukao 1980, 1987; Murase et al. 2010; Hongjamrassilp et al. 2020). There have been no studies of the larval stage of the genus except for the life history of N. bryope and larval descriptions of Neoclinus blanchardi Girard, 1858, Neoclinus okazakii Fukao, 1987, Neoclinus stephensae Hubbs, 1953, and Neoclinus uninotatus Hubbs, 1953 (see Shiogaki and Dotsu 1972; Watson 1996, 2009; Lindquist 1981; Okiyama 2014).

In June 2016, a larval stage of Neoclinus was collected from the eastern coast of Ulleung Island, East Sea (otherwise known as the Sea of Japan), and was identified as N. chihiroe by means of molecular analysis. The larva of this species has not previously been reported, so a morphological description is provided for the first time.

Materials and methods

A single specimen of a Neoclinus chihiroe larva was collected in June 2016 from near Juk Island, which is located off the eastern coast of Ulleung Island, East Sea, Korea (Fig. 1), and fixed as a whole body in 99% ethanol. All counts and measurements (to the nearest 0.1 mm) were made following Kendall (2011) using a stereomicroscope camera and associated imaging software (Leica Application Suite V.4.13; Leica, Germany). The specimen is deposited in the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea.

Figure 1. 

Sampling location (red dot) of Neoclinus chihiroe larva off Ulleung Island, East Sea.

Genomic DNA was extracted from the right eye of the specimen with a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The mitochondrial DNA Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified with a fish universal primer set (VF2_t1 and FishR2_t1) (Ward et al. 2005). The nucleotide sequence of the larval specimen and comparative species were deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases (accession numbers: N. chihiroe larva, PV715913; N. bryope, PV715914; Neoclinus nudus Stephens et Springer, 1971, PV715915; N. okazakii, PV715916; N. lacunicola, PV715917; and N. chihiroe, PV715918) (Table 1), but sequence data for N. nudiceps (one of the four species reported in Korea) is not publicly available and could not be included. Sequence for outgroup species was downloaded from the National Center for Biological Information database. The molecular analysis was conducted following Kwun and Kang (2023).

Table 1.

Neoclinus specimens used for molecular analysis.

Species Locality Voucher Accession
Larva
Neoclinus chihiroe Ulleung Island, Korea BDT-722 PV715913
Adult
Neoclinus bryope Jeju Island, Korea BDT-53 PV715914
Neoclinus nudus Hachiji-jima Island, Japan KAUM-I65059 PV715915
Neoclinus okazakii Hachiji-jima Island, Japan KAUM-I65053 PV715916
Neoclinus lacunicola Ulleung Island, Korea PI00049728 PV715917
Neoclinus chihiroe Dokdo, Korea PI00049711 PV715918
Outgroup
Enneapterygius etheostomus KU199075

Material examined. BDT-722: 1 specimen, 16.0 mm standard length (SL), 17 June 2016, Juk Island (37°31.54′N, 130°56.23′E), Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea.

Results

Description. Counts are provided in Table 2. Proportions as % SL: head length 25.6, body depth 13.8, snout length 5.0, caudal peduncle depth 8.1, caudal peduncle length 7.5, predorsal length 22.5, prepectoral length 25.6, prepelvic length 21.3, preanal length 40.0. Proportions as % head length (HL): eye diameter 26.8, upper jaw length 31.7, pectoral fin length 53.7, pelvic fin length 34.1.

Table 2.

Meristic characters of Neoclinus chihiroe.

Character Presently reported study Myoung et al. 2021 Fukao 1987
No. of specimens 1 1 40*
Standard length [mm] 16.0 52.5 21.0–49.0
Counts
Dorsal fin XXIII, 15 XXIII, 17 XXIII–XXV, 14–17
Anal fin II, 27 II, 27 II, 27–29
Pectoral fin 13 12 12–14
Pelvic fin I, 3 I, 3 I, 3

Body slender, elongated and compressed. Head slightly pointed. Snout short and its anterior tip blunt. Mouth terminal and moderately large. Posterior tip of maxilla reaching middle of eye vertically. Both lips thick. Two pairs of nostrils on snout, tubular anteriorly and round posteriorly. Head with cirri, one on anterior nostril and one on orbit. Both gill membranes continuous across and free from isthmus. Eye large, interorbital region slightly wide and convex. Anus located in front of middle of body. Single dorsal fin, and its origin located behind nape. Origin of anal fin located just behind anus. Dorsal and anal fins height low, extending to caudal peduncle. Caudal fin truncate, separated from posterior end of dorsal and anal fins. Pectoral fin fan-like, rounded, and posterior tip reaching level of anus. Pelvic fin slender, widening posteriorly, and posterior tip not reaching anus.

Coloration. When preserved in ethanol, head and body opaque yellowish white. Varying sizes of melanophores around eye, cheek, upper jaw, lower jaw angle, anterior region of branchiostegal membrane, preopercular area, and opercular area (Fig. 2A). Three pairs of asterisk-shaped melanophores on upper head, first pair medium in size and located on interorbital region, second pair large and on occipital, and third pair small and on nape (Fig. 2B). Six large pale asterisk-shaped melanophores sparsely separated on both sides of dorsal contour, and pale melanophores on mediolateral area of posterior body and middle of caudal peduncle. On ventral side, several melanophores aligned in row on isthmus, origin of pelvic fin, and abdomen (Fig. 2C). Many dark melanophores along ventral contour between each spinous and soft rays of anal fin. All fins semi-transparent.

Figure 2. 

Neoclinus chihiroe, larva, BDT-722, 16.0 mm (SL), Ulleung Island, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea. A: lateral view; B: dorsal view; C. ventral view. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Molecular analysis. Based on an analysis of the mitochondrial DNA COI sequence (537 bp), the larval specimen corresponded to the adult specimen of N. chihiroe at a genetic distance of 0.002 but differed from the other four Neoclinus species at genetic distances of 0.138–0.197. On a neighbor-joining tree, the larval specimen clustered closely with the adult specimen of N. chihiroe rather than with the other Neoclinus species (Fig. 3). This finding was supported by high bootstrap values.

Figure 3. 

Neighbor-joining tree of mitochondrial DNA Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I for five species of the genus Neoclinus. Number of branches (>80) correspond to bootstrap probabilities in 10 000 bootstrap replications. Bar indicates genetic distance of 0.10.

Discussion

Neoclinus chihiroe is only known to occur in Korea and Japan (Fukao 1987; Myoung et al. 2021), and its early life stages have previously been unknown. The early life stages of Neoclinus in general are poorly known, with the exception of N. bryope. A single specimen collected from the eastern coast of Ulleung Island, East Sea, was assigned to the genus Neoclinus based on the body shape (compressed, elongate, and preanal length short) and the presence of cirri on the head (Watson 2009; Okiyama 2014). Although this specimen is in the postflexion stage, morphological identification could not be made due to difficulties in distinguishing external characters among congeneric species and insufficient comparative data; however genetic analysis allowed the larval specimen to be identified as N. chihiroe. This is the first time that a N. chihiroe larva has been confirmed anywhere in the world.

The available information for Neoclinus chihiroe, N. bryope, and N. okazakii indicates that their larval stages are similar. Neoclinus chihiroe differs from N. bryope and N. okazakii in the distribution of melanophores on the body: there are one or two pale melanophores on the mediolateral area of the posterior body in N. chihiroe (presently reported study); many small melanophores along the mediolateral area of the body in N. bryope; and several large melanophores along the mediolateral area of the body in N. okazakii (see Okiyama 2014). Furthermore, despite the interspecific similarity in fin-ray counts within the genus Neoclinus, the larval N. chihiroe (presently reported study) was distinguished from the seven species reported in the western Pacific Ocean by its combination of dorsal fin spines and soft rays (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison of fin-rays of the genus Neoclinus in the western Pacific.

Species Dorsal fin Anal fin Pectoral fin Reference
Neoclinus chihiroe XXIII, 15 II, 27 13 Presently reported study
Neoclinus bryope XXV–XXVII, 16–19 II, 29–32 13–15 Okiyama 2014
Neoclinus chihiroe XXII–XXV, 14–17 II, 27–29 12–14 Okiyama 2014
Neoclinus lacunicola XXII–XXV, 16–19 II, 26–29 12–14 Fukao 1980
Neoclinus monogrammus XX–XXII, 18–19 II, 25–27 12–13 Murase et al. 2010
Neoclinus nudiceps XXI–XXIII, 17–18 II, 26–28 13 Murase et al. 2010
Neoclinus nudus XXIV–XXVI, 16–18 II, 28–30 12–14 Okiyama 2014
Neoclinus okazakii XXIV–XXV, 15–18 II, 28–30 12–14 Fukao 1987
Neoclinus toshimaensis XXIV–XXVIII, 14–21 II, 28–31 13–15 Fukao 1980

The adult N. chihiroe specimen reported from Korea was collected at Dokdo, East Sea (Myoung et al. 2021), and the larval specimen was collected at Ulleung Island, East Sea. Dokdo and Ulleung Island are geographically far from the Korean peninsula and have unique environmental and biological characteristics (Park et al. 2024). The fact that adults and larvae of coastal fishes are found together on islands far from land suggests that the species is adapted to and settled in these areas.

Acknowledgments

I thank Prof. Hiroyuki Motomura (Kagoshima University Museum) for providing tissues of comparative specimens. This work was supported by National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea Program (2025M00200).

References

  • Appleyard SA, Maher S, Miskiewicz AG, Lara-Lopez A, Matis P, Fielder DS, Suthers IM (2022) Genetic and morphological identification of formalin fixed, preserved larval fishes; can we have the best of both worlds? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 553: e151763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151763
  • Azmir IA, Esa Y, Amin SMN, Md Yasin IS, Md Yusof FZ (2017) Identification of larval fish in mangrove areas of Peninsular Malaysia using morphology and DNA barcoding methods. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 33: 998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13425
  • Fukao R (1980) Review of Japanese fishes of the genus Neoclinus with description of two new species and notes on habitat preference. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory 25: 175–209. https://doi.org/10.5134/175985
  • Fukao R (1987) Fishes of Neoclinus bryope species complex from Shirahama, Japan, with description of two new species. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 34: 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03380119
  • Girard C (1858) Fishes. General report upon zoology of the several Pacific railroad routes. In: Reports of explorations and surveys, to ascertain the most practicable and economical route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, Vol. 10. Beverley Tucker, Washington, 1–400. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.146979
  • Hongjamrassilp W, Murase A, Miki R, Hastings PA (2020) Journey to the west: Trans-Pacific historical biogeography of fringehead blennies in the genus Neoclinus (Teleostei: Blenniiformes). Zoological Studies (Taipei, Taiwan) 59: 9. https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2020.59-09
  • Hulley EN, Taylor NDJ, Zarnke AM, Somers CM, Manzon RG, Wilson JY, Boreham DR (2018) DNA barcoding vs. morphological identification of larval fish and embryos in Lake Huron: Advantages to a molecular approach. Journal of Great Lakes Research 44: 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.07.013
  • Kendall AW (2011) Identification of eggs and larvae of marine fishes. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 379 pp.
  • Ko HL, Wang YT, Chiu TS, Lee MA, Leu MY, Chang KZ, Chen WY, Shao KT (2013) Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of larval fishes by applying DNA barcoding. PLoS One 8: e53451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053451
  • Kwun HJ, Kang DW (2023) Molecular identification and morphological description of an unrecorded goby Bathygobius coalitus (Perciformes: Gobiidae), from Jeju-do, Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 16: 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2023.06.010
  • Lindquist DG (1981) Reproduction of the onespot fringehead, Neoclinus uninotatus in Monterey harbor, California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 80: 12–22.
  • Marancik KE, Richardson DE, Konieczna M. (2020) Updated morphological descriptions of the larval stage of Urophycis (family: Phycidae) from the northeast United States continental shelf. Copeia 108: 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1643/CG-19-219
  • Murase A, Aizawa M, Sunobe T (2010) Two new chaenopsid fishes, Neoclinus monogrammus and Neoclinus nudiceps (Teleostei: Perciformes: Blennioidei), from Japan. Species Diversity: An International Journal for Taxonomy, Systematics, Speciation, Biogeography, and Life History Research of Animals 15: 57–70. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.15.57
  • Myoung SH, Kwun HJ (2022) New record of Neoclinus nudiceps (Perciformes: Chaenopsidae) from Hongdo Island, southwestern Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 34: 288–293.
  • Myoung SH, Min WG, Woo MS, Kim YB, Shin JY (2021) New record of Neoclinus chihiroe (Perciformes: Chaenopsidae) from Dokdo, East Sea, Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 33: 142–147. https://doi.org/10.35399/isk.33.2.10
  • Okiyama M (2014) [An atlas of the early stage fishes in Japan, 2nd edn. ] Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 1896 pp. [In Japanese]
  • Park TH, Lee DY, Kang HY, Park JM, Kim D, Park HJ (2024) Trophic structure of fish assemblages in two offshore islands (Ulleungdo and Dokdo) of Korea revealed using stable isotope analysis. Frontiers in Marine Science 11: 1293542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1293542
  • Pozzobon APB, Ready JS, Di Dario F, Nunes-da-Fonseca R (2024) Identification of pre-flexion fish larvae from the western South Atlantic using DNA barcoding and morphological characters. PeerJ 12: e17791. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17791
  • Shiogaki M, Dotsu Y (1972) The life history of the bleniid fish, Neoclinus bryope. Nagasaki Daigaku Suisangakubu Kenkyu Hokoku 34: 1–8.
  • Smith JA, Miskiewicz AG, Berkley LE, Everett JD, Garcia V, Gray CA, Holliday D, Jordan AR, Keane J, Lara-Lopez A, Leis JM, Matis PA, Muhling BA, Neira FJ, Richardson AJ, Smith KA, Swadling KM, Syahailatua A, Taylor MD, van Ruth PD, Ward TM, Suthers IM (2018) A database of marine larval fish assemblages in Australian temperate and subtropical waters. Scientific Data 5: 180207. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.207
  • Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert P (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 360: 1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
  • Watson W (1996) Chaenopsidae. In: Moser HG (Ed.) The early stages of fishes in the California current region. Allen Press, Lawrence, 1170–1175.
  • Watson W (2009) Larval development in blennies. In: Patzner RA, Gonçalves EJ, Hastings PA, Kapoor BG (Eds) The biology of blennies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 309–352.
  • Xing B, Wang C, Wu Q, Wang Y, Chen X, Sun R, Zhang Z, Xiang P (2022) Species identification of larval fish in Hawaiian waters using DNA barcoding. Frontiers in Marine Science 9: e825395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.825395
login to comment