Corresponding author: Aiju Zhang ( zhangaiju2013@163.com ) Corresponding author: Zhimin Zhou ( zjhz-zzm@163.com ) Academic editor: Mirosław Przybylski
© 2021 Aiju Zhang, Wei Luo, Jun Wang, Zhimin Zhou.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zhang A, Luo W, Wang J, Zhou Z (2021) The time-area fishing closure impacts on fish stock; Qiantang River before and after a four-month fishing closure. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 51(4): 349-356. https://doi.org/10.3897/aiep.51.63815
|
Fishing closures, commonly used to manage fisheries’ catch, involve temporarily closing a body of water to particular fishing gears to control fishing effort and protect feeding and spawning areas. In recent years in Qiantang River of China, with the socio-economic development, protection of fish stock has become increasingly urgent. The year 2019 was the first year that Qiantang River was included in the unified fishing ban system for the south of Yangtze River basin. Here, fish captures and hydroacoustic surveys were carried out in the research area of Qiantang River in order to present comparative descriptions of the dominant fish species, the temporal changes of fish size, density, biomass, and distribution affected by the four-month fishing closure in 2019. The results showed that Pseudobrama simoni (Bleeker, 1864) was the most dominant species both before and after the closure by using the traditional capture method. The mean target strength (TS) of overall fish after closure was –50.28 ± 0.19 dB, which was lower than that before, resulting in a significantly shorter derived mean length (13.42 ± 0.74 cm). The mean fish density and calculated biomass after closure were both significantly higher than that before it. More than 50% of fish species were distributed in the water of 5–20 m depth after the closure, which likely occurred in water deeper than 20 m before. Meanwhile, fewer outliers were found in different depth categories after closure. It is concluded that the four-month closure in 2019 had a positive effect on fish size, density, and biomass, leading to protection of pelagic fishes and a more even distribution of fish.
capture, fishing closure, fish resource, hydroacoustics, Qiantang River
Given the increased use of modern fishing devices, many marine and freshwater fish resources are intensively exploited, resulting in rapid declines in some fish stock, affecting national economies, local communities’ socio-economic well-being, and even their protein saecurity (
With the improvement of instrument performance and the development of computer software, the hydroacoustic method has increasingly become one of the main methods for fishery stock assessments due to its advantage of a rapid, economic and extensive coverage of the water cross-section at distances large enough not to affect fish behavior (
In China, overfishing has also become one of the most serious problems in inland waters, as well as in oceans, and time-area fishing closure measures have been implemented since 2002. However, there has been no published assessment of overall fish stock following a closure in any rivers. Qiantang River is the largest river in Zhejiang province with a basin area of about 55 000 km2. Except for drinking, it also has functions of power generation, flood control, irrigation, and tourism. The river was historically rich in fish resources, and fish harvests date back several centuries, the highest take was recorded in 1960 with 5318.2 tones. Although harvest strategies incorporating seasonal bans and restricted fishing grounds have been conducted several years before 2019, which were mainly conducted in different tributaries of the river, the effects were not ideal due to inconsistency. The year 2019 was the first year that Qiantang River was included in the unified fishing ban system for the south of Yangtze River basin. Subsequently, all captures except recreational fishing should be banned in the main channel of Qiantang River from 1 March through 30 June every year in the future. So, what happened to fish stock after a four-month fishing closure in 2019?
Here, based on the data obtained from field fish collections and hydroacoustic surveys before and after the implementation of fishing closure in the main channel of Qiantang River, we compared the distribution of species in the research area, identified the dominant species, and evaluated changes in the fish size, density, biomass, and distribution. Our findings will present a description of characteristics of the temporal change effected by the closure and provide a scientific basis for the protection of fish stock in the river.
The study area belongs to a section of the main channel of Qiantang River, an important fishing stretch of water for fishermen in Fuyang and Tonglu counties (Fig.
Two fish removals were conducted by the hired fishermen in the research area in July 2018 and July 2019. The research area was evenly divided into 4 fish sampling sections, and the fishes were caught by deploying ground bamboo cages and multipanel nylon gillnets with mesh sizes ranging from 1 to 8 cm in each sampling section. All fishes caught were humanely euthanized, counted, and identified. Each specimen was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (total length, L) and weighed to the nearest 0.01 g (weight, W) simultaneously.
The dominant species was assessed according to the formula of
IRI = (%N + %W) × (%FO)
where %N is the individual number of a certain species relative to the total number of fishes, %W is the weight of a certain species relative to the total weight of all fishes, and %FO is the frequency of occurrence of a certain species among the 4 fish sampling sections. According to the evaluation criterion of
W = aLb
where W is the weight [g], L is the total length [cm], a is the intercept and b is the slope, was fitted with a simple linear regression model using log-transformed data.
Two hydroacoustic surveys were conducted on 17 July 2018 and 19 July 2019 by using a BioSonics split-beam DT-X echosounder (BioSonics, Seattle, WA, USA) with a 201 kHz transducer, an integrated GPS (Garmin 17xHVS, Garmin Ltd., Olathe, KS, USA) and a computer. Surveys were conducted during daylight sunshine, and the daily mean value of water temperature was 26.3°C and 23.5°C, respectively. A fishing boat was hired to help surveys at a speed of 2.0–2.5 m/s in a zig-zag route. During surveys, the transducer face was held 40–50 cm below the water surface. A standard BioSonices 36 mm tungsten carbide sphere was used to calibrate the transducer before each survey (
The hydroacoustic data were analyzed using BioSonics Visual Analyzer software 4.1 (BioSonics, Seattle, WA, USA), consistent with the scheme of
Based on single echo detections (SED), the TS distributions were examined. The received echo signals were compensated depending on their range (R)[m] by the time-varied gain (TVG). A 40 log(R) TVG was applied to measurements of TS, whereas a 20 log(R) TVG was used to the measurements of Sv used when echo integration. Then, the mean value of TS (based on SED from –60 dB to –30 dB in 2 dB bins) was converted to mean length of tracked fish using the empirical formulas for TS–length relation (
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 and Excel 2007. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SE). Prior to analysis, all data were tested for homogeneity (Levene’s test). The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis H test or one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the effects of fishing closure on mean TS, length, density, and biomass. To compare differences in fish density, water depths were divided into five intervals: 0–5 m, 5–10 m, 10–15 m, 15–20 m, 20–25 m, and >25 m. A two-way ANOVA was also performed to test the effects of water depth and fishing closure on fish densities. All tests were considered significant at a probability level of P < 0.05 (95% confidence). Box plot was performed in R 3.6.1 environment (
In total, 47 and 44 fish species were identified before and after fishing closure respectively, both representing 9 orders and 14 families. Pseudobrama simoni (Bleeker, 1864) was found to be the most dominant species with the highest IRI values of 2965.31 and 2867.78, respectively, and the estimated length–weight relation (LWR) parameters a and b of this fish species were 0.0256 and 2.8117, respectively, indicating the LWR equation as:
W = 0.0256 × L2.8117
(R2 = 0.957, n = 235).
However, subdominant species and common species were found to be changed. Three subdominant species were Distoechodon tumirostris Peters, 1881 (IRI = 1581.73), Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758) (IRI = 1128.68), and Squalidus argentatus (Sauvage et Dabry de Thiersant, 1874) (IRI = 1091.01) before fishing closure, which changed to be Coilia nasus Temminck et Schlegel, 1846 (IRI = 1373.68), Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844) (IRI = 1106.22), and Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 (IRI = 1003.29) after closure. Meanwhile, the first four common species, including Tachysurus nitidus (Sauvage et Dabry de Thiersant, 1874) (IRI = 991.73), Cyprinus carpio (IRI = 660.82), Megalobrama terminalis (Richardson, 1846) (IRI = 515.49), and Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) (IRI = 500.08) changed to be Tachysurus nitidus (IRI = 953.76), Carassius auratus (IRI = 911.04), Eleotris oxycephala Temminck et Schlegel, 1845 (IRI = 753.00), and Megalobrama terminalis (IRI = 688.85) after closure, two species of which were different.
Results of the two hydroacoustic surveys showed a significant difference (H2, 632 = 18.797, P < 0.05), with the mean TS before fishing closure (–49.17 ± 0.21 dB) greater than that after it (–50.28 ± 0.19). According to the formula, the derived mean lengths before and after closure were 15.26 ± 0.48 cm and 13.42 ± 0.74 cm, respectively, which also showed significant temporal differences (one-way ANOVA, F1, 632 = 4.567, P < 0.05).
Echoes of more than –58 dB target strength were considered fish. The TS before and after the fishing ban both ranged from –58 dB to –34 dB. To compare differences in fish population sizes, fishes were divided into small-, mid-, and large-sized categories, based on their length (TS conversion). TS distributions varied between two surveys. Before closure, mid-sized fish of TS –50 to –38 dB (≈11−48 cm) accounted for 59.81% of the population, while small-sized fish under –50 dB accounted for 38.51% of all fish (Fig.
Proportional composition of fish populations before and after the fishing closure.
Size class [cm] | Before closure [%] | After closure [%] |
Small-size (≈7–11) | 38.51 | 40.24 |
Med-size (≈11–48) | 59.81 | 58.86 |
Large-size (>48) | 1.68 | 0.90 |
Fish density after the fishing closure (3997.4 ± 466.89 fish/ha) was significantly greater than that before it (1716.4 ± 142.47 fish/ha) (H2, 632 = 13.086, P < 0.05). The mean calculated biomass after closure (3238.1 ± 2543.9 kg/ha) was also significantly higher than that before closure (1282.2 ± 323.37 kg/ha) (one-way ANOVA, F1, 632 = 3.673, P < 0.05).
More than 50% of fish species were found in the >20 m category before closure. While fish gradually moved towards the upper water layer, leading to the most distributed layers of fish being located at 15–20 m, 5–10 m, and 10–15 m depth after closure, accounting for 24.95%, 20.44%, and 18.30% of the total fish in the research area, indicating a wider spread of fish (Table
Percentage of fish distributed in different depth categories before and after the fishing closure.
Depth category [m] | Before closure [%] | After closure [%] |
0–5 | 3.19 | 3.48 |
5–10 | 6.79 | 20.44 |
10–15 | 17.36 | 18.30 |
15–20 | 18.69 | 24.95 |
20–25 | 21.55 | 17.59 |
>25 | 32.42 | 15.25 |
With a time-area closure, an area of water is closed to fishing with particular fishing gears during certain time periods. Originally, a time-area closure is commonly focusing on a single, target species and a single fishery (e.g., parrotfish, shrimp, tropical tuna) (
In recent years in Qiantang River, with the socio-economic development, protection of fish stock has become increasingly serious. Although modern gears in the river are limited to gillnets, which are three-tiered with mesh sizes varying from 1 to 8 cm, the fishing mode results in indiscriminate harvesting of undersized and non-target species. The volume of fish stock in the river has declined, and the fish population structure is known to have changed. According to literature records, 136 fish species could be collected in this river in the late 1970s, receding to 122 species in 2018. Also, it has been found that some native fishes, e.g., Acipenser sinensis Gray, 1835, Psephurus gladius (Martens, 1862), Tenualosa reevesii (Richardson, 1846), and Protosalanx hyalocranius (Abbott, 1901), have disappeared and some alien ones, e.g., Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819 and Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818), have become common. Thus, a fishing closure is conducive to the sustainable development of fishery in the river.
In practice, the general closure period in Qiantang River included in the unified fishing ban system for the south of Yangtze River basin is from 1 March through 31 June, lasting for 4 months. It is confirmed that many economically important fish propagate at this time every year, and the aggregating behavior of breeding fish makes them more vulnerable to capture.
It is accepted that such a closure can effectively protect fish spawning and hatching, and is also beneficial for the growth of fish larvae, to promote the natural supplement of fish resources and the self-restoration of the ecological environment in the waters (
Fishing closure resulted in a change of fish distribution. It is accepted that time-area closures are often preferred for more mobile pelagic species (
The reasons for the time-area ban policy are biological, concerned with protecting and restoring fish stock, not only impacting catches of target species, but also non-target species that can be sold, and non-target species that do not have commercial value for fishermen (
The authors are thankful to Dr Aihuan Guo, Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fisheries, Huzhou for the assistant analysis of hydroacoustic data. The financial support was provided by Zhejiang Science and Technology Project (No. 2019C02047), Zhejiang, China.