Short Communication
Print
Short Communication
First record and otolith morphometric description of an adult lightfish, Ichthyococcus ovatus (Actinopterygii: Stomiiformes: Phosichthyidae), caught in the Strait of Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea)
expand article infoGiacomo Sardo, Michele Luca Geraci§, Fabio Falsone, Salvatore Gancitano, Vita Gancitano, Danilo Scannella, Charles Odilichukwu R. Okpala|, Antonino Titone, Sergio Vitale
‡ Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnologies, Mazara del Vallo, Italy
§ University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
Open Access

Abstract

On July 2018, one specimen of Ichthyococcus ovatus (Cocco, 1838) was caught in the Strait of Sicily during the International Bottom Trawl Survey in the Mediterranean (MEDITS). The adult I. ovatus measured 49 mm in total length and weighed 1.44 g. In this context, the presently reported study constitutes the first and deepest record of an adult of I. ovatus as well as the morphometric description of its sagittal otoliths. In addition, we provide an age estimation as well as an update of the geographical distribution of this bathypelagic species around the Mediterranean Sea. Based on the growth increments of sagittal otoliths, the estimated age was five years. Specifically, the otolith from the presently reported specimen of I. ovatus tended to be elliptic in shape related to aspect ratio and high rectangularity while circularity showed high complexity of otolith contour complexity. The absence of economic value of rarely reported species may underestimate their abundance. Therefore, more studies and research surveys would be necessary to fill the information gap on the biology of these deep-water species.

Keywords

Mediterranean deep sea, otolith, rare species, MEDITS, Strait of Sicily, trawl survey

Introduction

The family Phosichthyidae of the order Stomiiformes (Froese and Pauly 2022) comprises lightfishes that produce bioluminescence by ventrally located photophores (Schaefer et al. 1986). Specifically, this family constitutes a monophyletic group characterized by members with the advanced characters of three pectoral fin radials, which are further reduced in some genera with extremely small pectoral fins, and type gamma photophores having a lumen and duct (Weitzman 1974). Actually, earlier workers believed Phosichthyidae performed active diel vertical migration (Clarke 1971), which recent workers considered to range from the mesopelagic to epipelagic zones (Goçalo et al. 2011). However, only a few species of Phosichthyidae such as Vinciguerria poweriae (Cocco, 1838), Vinciguerria attenuata (Cocco, 1838), and Pollichthys mauli (Poll, 1953) have shown active diel migration (Badcock, 1984). Furthermore, fishes belonging to this family perform pelagic spawning, which allows them to deliver planktonic eggs and larvae (Ahlstrom and Ball 1954). However, not all genera of the family Phosichthyidae have been well studied. In particular, the genus Ichthyococcus Bonaparte, 1840 appears more evolute than the other congeneric species that are relatively primitive (Weitzman 1974). The genus Ichthyococcus includes 8 species (Froese and Pauly 2022), wherein Ichthyococcus ovatus (Cocco, 1848) has been singled out as an almost cosmopolitan bathypelagic species, found across a wide range of waters from the North Eastern Atlantic to the western/central Mediterranean basin (Lin et al. 2018; GBIF 2022). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that I. ovatus appears to be the only species of the genus Ichthyococcus reported within the Mediterranean Basin (Lin et al. 2018; GBIF 2022).

In relation to the Mediterranean Sea, the authors herein could only find the study of Battaglia et al. (2010) who reported the otolith morphology relations between some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Strait of Messina. Otoliths are calcified structures (CaCO3) located in the inner ear of fish providing sensory information about balance as well as hearing (Campana and Thorrold 2001; Popper et al. 2005). In particular, otoliths are demonstrated to continuously grow throughout the life of the fish (Chilton and Beamish 1992) along with absence of resorption or short-time variation (Cadrin and Friedland 2005). Such characteristics make otolith a powerful tool for age determination, and this activity entails reading (i.e., counting) the growth bands laid down as zones of opaque and translucent material (Ross et al. 2005; Rodríguez Mendoza 2006). Notably, the appearance, as well as shape of otolith (most often, the sagitta) in fish specimens remain species specific and can differ between populations of the same species in different locations (Lombarte et al. 2006; Ozpicak et al. 2018). This makes the otolith morphometry/shape a valuable tool for the identification of fish species. Additionally, the interspecific variations of otolith are considered useful for the identification of the stock as well as assessment of environmentally induced variation (Campana 2005; Rodríguez Mendoza 2006). More so, the form factor, roundness, and rectangularity are among such parameters that characterize the shape of the otolith’s parts (Russ 1990).

Apart from the geographical distribution and nictemeral migration, the biological information about lightfishes appears limited. Furthermore, relevant information regarding the otoliths of I. ovatus specific to the Strait of Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea), to our best knowledge, is not available. Therefore, to supplement existing information, the presently reported study presents the first record and otolith morphometric description of an adult lightfish, I. ovatus, caught in the Strait of Sicily. In addition, we provide an age estimation as well as an update of the geographical distribution of this bathypelagic species around the Mediterranean Sea.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, identification, and biometrics. On July 2018, one specimen of Ichthyococcus ovatus (trawl haul points: 36°36.89′N, 013°21.24′E) was caught, at a depth of about 547 m, during the International Bottom Trawl Survey in the Mediterranean (MEDITS) (Bertrand et al. 2002) in the Strait of Sicily. The sample was transported to the laboratory of CNR-IRBIM of Mazara del Vallo. The identification of the specimen was conducted following descriptions of Badcock (1984). The biometric data involved total length (TL), standard length (SL), head length, eye diameter, total weight, as well as dorsal, pectoral, ventral, and anal fin lengths. In addition to weight with an accuracy of 0.01 g, the length measurement was conducted to the nearest 0.1 mm using a vernier caliper. In particular, photophores were counted as follows:

  • entire ventral photophores row extending from anterior end of isthmus to posterior termination of this row on caudal peduncle (IC);
  • ventral series of pelvic and anal photophores, part of IC extending between a vertical line at insertion of posterior pelvic fin ray and anal fin origin or to end of row (VAV + AC);
  • entire lateral series photophores on body side (OA).

Age estimation and otolith morphometry. The otoliths’ extraction was performed based on the procedures recommended by Secor et al. (1992), which entailed the cleaning of the blood, otic sac, and other membranes using distilled water, subsequently stored in labelled vials and thereafter, allowed to air-dry for 48 h. More so, the weight of each otolith was measured to 0.0001 mg using an analytical balance (Entris® II Advanced Line; Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany). Whole otoliths were placed in a dish with tap water and a black background and viewed under reflected light through a stereomicroscope (Leica Wild Mz12.5; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) at 1.0× magnification. The contrast between opaque and translucent zones was enhanced by Adobe Photoshop software (v. 22.0, Adobe, San Jose, USA). The examination of whole otoliths required viewing the distal surface as shown in Fig. 1A. The age estimation was assigned independently by two readers using the views of whole otoliths and without additional information. Importantly, the growth zones of the otoliths were visible across the height (dorsal–ventral) as well as the length (anterior–posterior) surfaces, whereas the presumptive annuli were identified and counted from the core to margin along the longest axis of otoliths (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the opaque zones were counted.

Figure 1. 

(A) Distal surface of the sagittal otoliths from Ichthyococcus ovatus. (B) Enhanced image of the right otolith used to count presumptive annuli for age estimation. Black dots represent the growth rings; the distance between a and b is the otolith width while the distance between c and d is the otolith length; (C), proximal surface of the left otolith showing rostrum (R), antirostrum (A), excisura ostii (E), sulcus acusticus (SA, continuous line), colliculum ostii (CO, dotted line), colliculum caudii (CC, dashed line).

The morphometric data of the otoliths were collected, which included area (Ao), perimeter (Po), length (Lo, maximal distance from the anterior tip to the posterior edge, parallel to the sulcus (Harvey et al. 2000)) and width (Wo, maximal distance from the dorsal otolith edge to the ventral one, perpendicular to the sulcus). The morphometric parameters were measured using the ImageJ v.1.53f51 software (Wayne Rasband (NIH), Bethesda, USA), which cumulatively enabled such dimensionless shape indices like otolith relative length (100(Lo/TL), 100(Lo/SL)), otolith relative size (1000(Ao/TL2)), aspect ratio (Ar, shape tendency of otolith, Lo/Wo), form factor (Ff, its values range from 0 to 1 where a value of 1 corresponding to a perfect circle, 4ΠAo/P2 where Π is the pi, i.e. about 3.14), ellipticity (El, values close to 0 indicating a tendency towards circularity, (LoWo)/(Lo + Wo)), roundness (Ro, the larger it is the more the otolith shape approximates that of a disk, 4AoLo2), rectangularity (Re, a value of 1 indicating a perfect rectangle or square, Ao/(Lo × Wo)) and circularity (Ci, complexity of otolith contour, P2/Ao) (Russ 1990; Tuset et al. 2003; Pavlov 2016). In addition, a pictorial comparison with the extant literature was performed.

Geographical distribution and mapping. The geographical distribution of this lightfish species has been prepared by compiling all existing scientific literature concerning reported records of I. ovatus with particular reference to the Mediterranean Sea. Every published article we found that contained reports of I. ovatus in the Mediterranean Sea was scrutinized in order to extract the spatial data. In addition, the Mediterranean records of this species lacking in the literature were found using the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2022). In particular, all the records not verified in GBIF were excluded. Lastly, the records of I. ovatus were mapped via the help of Quantum GIS software (QGIS 2020).

Results

The photographic image of the Ichthyococcus ovatus specimen caught in the Strait of Sicily is shown in Fig. 2. The biometric and meristic measurements of individual I. ovatus specimen are showed in Table 1.

Figure 2. 

Ichthyococcus ovatus specimen that was caught in the Strait of Sicily.

Table 1.

Comparison of biometric and meristic characters of the presently reported Ichthyococcus ovatus from the Strait of Sicily with those provided by selected literature sources.

Character This paper Lombarte et al. 2006 Battaglia et al. 2010
n = 1 n = 1 n = 40
Absolute Relative Meristic Absolute Absolute
[mm] [g] [%SL] mm mm [g]
Total length 59 45
Standard length 49 16.9–38.1
Head length 14 28.6
Eye diameter 4 8.2
Total weight 1.44 0.11–1.27
Dorsal fin length 9 18.4
Pectoral fin length 7 14.3
Ventral fin length 4 8.2
Anal fin length 7 14.3
Dorsal fin rays 11
Pectoral fin rays 8
Ventral fin rays 7
Anal fin rays 16
Vertebrae 42
IC 46
VAV + AC 21
OA 23

The examination of the whole otoliths by the distal surface as shown in Fig. 1. Considering the visibility of the growth zones (Fig. 1B), an age estimation and gross morphology of the otolith of the I. ovatus specimen appeared feasible. Thus, the putative age was estimated at five years. According to the terminology used by Smale et al. (1995) and Tuset et al. (2008), the gross morphology was described as follows: Shape: high and approximately triangular, entire to sinuate margins; Thickness: moderately thick; Form: Mesial slightly concave, Lateral very convex; Sulcus acusticus: pseudo-ostial, median, dorsal and ventral area similar sized; crista superior absent; crista inferior with a low ridge-like along entire sulcus acusticus. Ostium: elliptic, confined to antero-dorsal part of rostrum. Cauda: round-oval. Ostio-cauda differentiation: slight ventral constriction. Anterior region: peaked to notched with irregular margin, extended rostrum, very short and round antirostrum, excisura narrow with a shallow notch. Posterior region: entire to sinuate margins (Fig. 1C). The shape parameters and indices measured from the left sagittal otolith of I. ovatus caught in the Strait of Sicily can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2.

Shape parameters and indices from otolith of Ichthyococcus ovatus from the Strait of Sicily, described in the presently reported study.

Shape parameters Value
Area (Ao) [mm2] 8.89
Perimeter (Po) [mm] 17.01
Mass (Mo) [mg] 0.0154
Length (Lo) [mm] 3.99
Width (Wo) [mm] 4.68
Shape indices
Otolith relative length (TL) 6.76
Otolith relative length (SL) 8.14
Otolith relative size 2.55
Aspect ratio (Ar) 0.85
Form factor (Ff) 0.39
Ellipticity (El) 0.07
Roundness (Ro) 0.71
Rectangularity (Re) 0.48
Circularity (Ci) 32.54

Overall, the otolith of the presently reported study tended to be elliptic in shape related to aspect ratio (Ar) and high rectangularity (Re) while circularity (Ci) showed high complexity of otolith contour (Table 2). Moreover, comparing the sagitta otoliths of this work (Fig. 3A) with those of published literature (Fig. 3B and 3C), there appears to be a somewhat but slight observable difference. Specifically, the otoliths of Canary Islands and Strait of Messina possess rather shallower notches between the rostrum and antirostrum. Further, the rostrum appear somewhat prominent, whereas much less so for the antirostrum, and with different shapes in the Canary Islands and Strait of Messina.

Figure 3. 

Ichthyococcus ovatus otolith (A) proximal view of the left sagitta from the Strait of Sicily, (B) otolith from the Canary Islands, (C) otolith from the Strait of Messina.

Map comparing the geographical distribution of I. ovatus of the presently reported study with those of other previous studies within the Mediterranean Basin is shown in Fig. 4, which suggests the widespread nature of this lightfish species.

Figure 4. 

Map showing the geographical distribution of Ichthyococcus ovatus based on the previous and the presently reported study within the Mediterranean Basin. Specific records include: green, blue, violet, pink, stripes, and green pentagon as larvae; brown and light green stripes as the probable catch areas for specimens of Libyan, and Egyptian waters, respectively.

Discussion

Consistent with the features described by Badcock (1984), this Ichthyococcus ovatus specimen physically appeared dark in the back, silvery-translucent to the flanks and with the fin rays speckled basally. The photophores, biometrics and meristic counts of the I. ovatus specimen appear consistent with information provided by Badcock (1984). Notably, the nature and patterns of photophores are of high importance for discrimination of Ichthyococcus spp. as well as identifying larvae and adults (Ahlstrom et al. 1984). In particular, symphyseal photophores were absent whereas photophores of the ventral series, from the pectoral fin base to the pelvic fin base and from the anal fin base to caudal fin base, were in a straight line when viewed from below and continuous, respectively. According to Badcock (1984), the photophores development complete at about 15–17 mm of SL. Thus, our specimen might be ascribed as an adult of I. ovatus. As we have considered the putative age of the I. ovatus specimen to be estimated at five years, it is feasible to treat the specimen as an adult. However, the periodicity in the formation of the rings would need to be established. In addition, age validation studies would be required if a more accurate age determination of this lightfish species is to be realized. Additionally, the pictorial comparison with the extant literature might show a possibility of differentiation between the population of I. ovatus in the Canary Islands (Atlantic Ocean), Strait of Sicily, and Strait of Messina.

Environmental factors are believed to influence the otolith shape such as the depth, temperature, substrate type, salinity, and feeding conditions (Lombarte and Lleonart 1993; Torres et al. 2000). Besides, the different variations in otolith shape would at times be interpreted to result from habitat differentiation (Morat et al. 2012). For instance, Vignon and Morat (2010) showed that contrasting environmental factors induce an overall change in otolith shape, but genetically induced changes locally affect the otolith shape in the area of the rostrum and antirostrum for bluestripe snapper Lutjanus kasmira (Forsskål, 1775). However, to clearly establish the specific details, it is necessary that a proper shape analysis (and more otoliths) be performed. Indeed, the literature on the biology and distribution of deep-water species is scarce. In addition, relevant information concerning the size at maturity, feeding strategy, sexual dimorphism, and growth of I. ovatus appears scanty.

The widespread nature of this lightfish species is demonstrated by its geographical distribution within the Mediterranean Sea. The records in the waters off Libya (Elbaraasi et al. 2019; GBIF 2022) and western coasts of Egypt (Akel and Karachle 2017; GBIF 2022) suggest that the geographical range of I. ovatus can extend to the Levantine basin of the Mediterranean Sea. Other workers found it as reported at different areas, for example, the Western and Central basin such as the Catalan Sea, Balearic Sea, Corsican Sea, Tyrrhenian Sea, Ionian Sea, Gulf of Hammamet, and Strait of Messina (Palomera and Rubies 1979; Papaconstantinou 1990; Biagi et al. 2002; Sabatés 2004; Mytilineou et al. 2005; Battaglia et al. 2010; Somarakis et al. 2011; Olivar et al. 2012; Rodríguez et al. 2013; Zarrad et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2018; GBIF 2022). Further, the occurrence of I. ovatus within the Mediterranean Sea would reach depths, ranging from 40 up to 1100 m (Granata et al. 2011; Olivar et al. 2012; Rodríguez et al. 2013; Zarrad et al. 2013). In particular, the records up to a depth of 200 m were ascribed as fish larvae (Sabatés 2004; Cuttitta et al. 2004; Somarakis et al. 2011; Zarrad et al. 2013). According to Watanabe et al. (1999), diel vertical migration is known to occur in several groups of fish and their larvae, especially in species with light organs. Further, I. ovatus vary in bathymetric range from the mesopelagic zone at a depth of about 200–500 m (Schaefer et al. 1986) to the deeper waters of the bathypelagic zone (Yang et al. 1996). It is important to mention here that the first record of I. ovatus, specifically at its larval stage, in the Strait of Sicily, was reported by Cuttitta et al. (2004) and since then, there appears to have been no other published report. Therefore, this presently reported study shows the first occurrence of an adult I. ovatus specimen in the Strait of Sicily. Besides, the I. ovatus specimens in the presently reported study represented the deepest record of this species in the Strait of Sicily.

Conclusions

The first record and morphometric description of sagittae otoliths in an adult Ichthyococcus ovatus specific to the Strait of Sicily has been presented in this communication. It also included an updated geographical distribution of this deep-water species around the Mediterranean Sea. As we have considered the putative age of the I. ovatus specimen estimated at five years, the periodicity in the formation of the rings must be established and age validation studies are required for accurate age determination of this lightfish species. This presently reported study is preliminary and lays a baseline for the future study of this I. ovatus species, which are not commonly caught by trawling likely because of its bathymetric distribution. A more robust study involving age validation and shape analysis will require the collection of more I. ovatus species samples. Indeed, the absence of economic value of rarely reported species may actually underestimate their presence/abundance in the Mediterranean basin (Sardo et al. 2020). Besides improving the sampling design (Falsone et al. 2017; Geraci et al. 2019), more research surveys involving the collection of meso- and bathypelagic fish fauna would be necessary in order to fill the information gap on the biology of these Mediterranean deep-water species.

Acknowledgments

This work is conducted thanks to the European Data Collection Framework (DCF)—MEDITS survey module—funded by the European Union and the Italian Ministry for Agricultural, Food, and Forestry Policies.

References

  • Ahlstrom EH, Ball OP (1954) Description of eggs and larvae of jack mackerel (Trachurus symmetricus) and distribution and abundance of larvae in 1950 and 1951. Fishery Bulletin 56: 209–245.
  • Ahlstrom EH, Richards WJ, Weitzman SH (1984) Families Gonostomatidae, Sternoptychidae, and associated stomiiform groups: Development and relationships. Pp. 184–198. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AWJr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes based on and international symposium dedicated to the memory of Elbert Halvor Ahlstrom. The symposium was held August 15–18, 1983, La Jolla, California. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. Special Publication No. 1.
  • Badcock J (1984) Photichthyidae. P. 510. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (Eds) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO 1.
  • Battaglia P, Malara D, Romeo T, Andaloro F (2010) Relationships between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina, Italy). Scientia Marina 74(3): 605–612. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2010.74n3605
  • Biagi F, Sartor P, Ardizzone GD, Belcari P, Belluscio A, Serena F (2002) Analysis of demersal fish assemblages of the Tuscany and Latium coasts (north-western Mediterranean). Scientia Marina 66(S2): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2002.66s2233
  • Cadrin SX, Friedland KD (2005) Morphometric outlines. Pp. 173–184. In: Cadrin SX, Friedland KD, Waldman JR (Eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012154351-8/50009-5
  • Campana SE, Thorrold SR (2001) Otoliths, increments, and elements: Keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58(1): 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-177
  • Campana SE (2005) Otolith elemental composition as a natural marker of fish stocks. Pp. 227–245. In: Cadrin SX, Friedland K, Waldman JR (Eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012154351-8/50013-7
  • Chilton DE, Beamish RJ (1992) Age determination methods for fishes studied by the groundfish program at the Pacific Biological Station. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Ottawa, 60: 102 pp.
  • Clarke GL (1971) Light conditions in the sea in relation to the diurnal vertical migrations of animal). Pp. 41–50. In: Farquaar GB (Ed) (1971). Proceedings of the international symposium on biological sound scattering in the ocean. Maury Center Ocean Science, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Cuttitta A, Arigo A, Basilone G, Bonanno A, Buscaino G, Rollandi L, Garcia Lafuente J, Garcia A, Mazzola S, Patti B (2004) Mesopelagic fish larvae species in the Strait of Sicily and their relationships to main oceanographic events. Hydrobiologia 527(1): 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000043299.65829.2f
  • Elbaraasi H, Elabar B, Elaabidi S, Bashir A, Elsilini O, Shakman E, Azzurro E (2019) Updated checklist of bony fishes along the Libyan coasts (southern Mediterranean Sea). Mediterranean Marine Science 20(1): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.15570
  • Falsone F, Geraci ML, Scannella D, Okpala COR, Giusto GB, Bosch-Belmar M, Bono G (2017) Occurrence of two rare species from order Lampriformes: Crestfish Lophotus lacepede (Giorna, 1809) and scalloped ribbonfish Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) in the northern coast of Sicily, Italy. Acta Adriatica 58(1): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.32582/aa.58.1.11
  • GBIF (2022) Global Biodiversity Information Facility.
  • Geraci ML, Di Lorenzo M, Falsone F, Scannella D, Di Maio F, Colloca F, Vitale S, Serena F (2019) The occurrence of Norwegian skate, Dipturus nidarosiensis (Elasmobranchii: Rajiformes: Rajidae), in the Strait of Sicily, central Mediterranean. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 49(2): 203–208. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIEP/02566
  • Goçalo CG, Katsuragawa M, Silveira ICAD (2011) Patterns of distribution and abundance of larval Phosichthyidae (Actinopterygii, Stomiiformes) in southeastern Brazilian waters. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 59(3): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592011000300002
  • Granata A, Cubeta A, Minutoli R, Bergamasco A, Guglielmo L (2011) Distribution and abundance of fish larvae in the northern Ionian Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Helgoland Marine Research 65(3): 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-010-0231-2
  • Harvey JT, Oughlin TR, Perez MA, Oxman DS (2000) Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Technical Report 150: 1–36.
  • Lin CH, Chiang YP, Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Girone A (2018) Late Quaternary to Recent diversity of fish otoliths from the Red Sea, central Mediterranean, and NE Atlantic sea bottoms. Geobios 51(4): 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2018.06.002
  • Lombarte A, Lleonart J (1993) Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environmental Biology of Fishes 37(3): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004637
  • Lombarte A, Chic O, Parisi-Baradad V, Olivella R, Piera J, Garca-Ladona E (2006) A web-based environment from shape analysis of fish otoliths. The AFORO database. Scientia Marina 70(1): 147–152. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2006.70n1147
  • Morat F, Letourneur Y, Nérini D, Banaru D, Batjakas IE (2012) Discrimination of red mullet populations (Teleostean, Mullidae) along multi-spatial and ontogenetic scales within the Mediterranean basin on the basis of otolith shape analysis. Aquatic Living Resources 25(1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2011151
  • Mytilineou C, Politou CY, Papaconstantinou C, Kavadas S, D’Onghia G, Sion L (2005) Deep-water fish fauna in the Eastern Ionian Sea. Belgian Journal of Zoology 135(2): 229–233.
  • Olivar MP, Bernal A, Molí B, Peña M, Balbín R, Castellón A, Miquel J, Massutí E (2012) Vertical distribution, diversity and assemblages of mesopelagic fishes in the western Mediterranean. Deep-sea Research. Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers 62: 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2011.12.014
  • Ozpicak M, Saygin S, Aykut Yydin A, Hancer E, Savaşyilmaz S, Polat N (2018) Otolith shape analyses of Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) inhabiting four inland water bodies of the middle Black Sea region, Turkey. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 5(4): 293–302.
  • Palomera I, Rubiés P (1979) Ichthyoplancton de la mer Catalane. Larves de poissons récoltées sur deux stations fixes devant Barcelona au cours d’un cycle annuel (1975–1976). Commission Internationale pour l’Exploration Scientifique de la mer Méditerranée: Comité des vertébrés marins et céphalopodes (1978). Rapports et procès-verbaux des réunions 26/27(10): 201–206.
  • Papaconstantinou C (1990) Some rare mesopelagic and bathyal fish caught in the Greek seas. HCMR, Athens.
  • Popper AN, Ramcharitar J, Campana SE (2005) Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Marine and Freshwater Research 56(5): 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04267
  • QGIS Development Team. 2020. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
  • Rodríguez JM, Alvarez I, López-Jurado JL, Garcia A, Balbín R, Álvarez-Berastegui D, Torres AP, Alemany F (2013) Environmental forcing and the larval fish community associated to the Atlantic bluefin tuna spawning habitat of the Balearic region (Western Mediterranean), in early summer 2005. Deep-sea Research. Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers 77: 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2013.03.002
  • Rodríguez Mendoza RP (2006) Otoliths and their applications in fishery science. Croatian Journal of Fisheries: Ribarstvo 64(3): 89–102.
  • Ross JR, Crosby JD, Kosa JT (2005) Accuracy and Precision of Age Estimation of Crappies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25(2): 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1577/M04-083.1
  • Russ JC (1990) Computer-assisted microscopy: The measurement and analysis of images. Plenum Press, New York, 453 pp.
  • Sabatés A (2004) Diel vertical distribution of fish larvae during the winter-mixing period in the northwestern Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science 61(8): 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.07.022
  • Sardo G, Geraci ML, Scannella D, Falsone F, Vitale S (2020) New records of two uncommon species, Calappa tuerkayana Pastore, 1995 (Decapoda, Calappidae) and Parasquilla ferrussaci (Roux, 1828) (Stomatopoda, Parasquillidae), from the Strait of Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea). Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica 18: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.32800/amz.2020.18.0113
  • Schaefer S, Johnson RK, Badcock J (1986) Photichthyidae. Pp. 243–247. In: Smith MM, Heemstra PC (Eds) Smiths’ sea fishes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Secor DH, Dean JM, Laban EH (1992) Otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. Stevenson DK, Campana SE (Eds) Otolith microstructure examination and analysis. Canada Communication Group, Ottawa, 19–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1446235
  • Smale MJ, Watson G, Hecht T (1995) Otolith atlas of southern African marine fishes. Ichthyological Monographs of the J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Vol. 1, 253 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.141860
  • Somarakis S, Isari S, Machias A (2011) Larval fish assemblages in coastal waters of central Greece: Reflections of topographic and oceanographic heterogeneity. Scientia Marina 75(3): 605–618. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2011.75n3605
  • Torres GJ, Lombarte A, Morales-Nin B (2000) Sagittal otolith size and shape variability to identify geographical intraspecific differences in three species of genus Merluccius. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80(2): 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315499001915
  • Tuset VM, Lozano IJ, González JA, Pertusa JF, García‐Díaz MM (2003) Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 19(2): 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00344.x
  • Vignon M, Morat F (2010) Environmental and genetic determinant of otolith shape revealed by a non-indigenous tropical fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411: 231–241. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08651
  • Watanabe H, Moku M, Kawaguchi K, Ishimaru K, Ohno A (1999) Diel vertical migration of myctophid fishes (Family Myctophidae) in the transitional waters of the western North Pacific. Fisheries Oceanography 8(2): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2419.1999.00103.x
  • Weitzman SH (1974) Osteology and evolutionary relationships of the Sternoptychidae with a new classification of stomiatoid families. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 153(3): 327–478.
  • Yang J, Huang Z, Chen S, Li Q (1996) [The deep-water pelagic fishes in the area form Nansha Islands to the northeast part of South China Sea. ] Science Publication Company, Beijing, China, 190 pp. [In Chinese]
  • Zarrad R, Alemany F, Rodriguez JM, Jarboui O, Lopez-Jurado JL, Balbin R (2013) Influence of summer conditions on the larval fish assemblage in the eastern coast of Tunisia (Ionian Sea, Southern Mediterranean). Journal of Sea Research 76: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.08.001
login to comment