Research Article |
Corresponding author: Fikret Öndes ( fikretegesu@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Sanja Matić-Skoko
© 2023 Fikret Öndes, Vahdet Ünal.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Öndes F, Ünal V (2023) The dominance of non-indigenous species in the catch composition of small-scale fisheries: A case study from the Kaş–Kekova Special Environmental Protection Area, Türkiye, Eastern Mediterranean. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 53: 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/aiep.53.96788
|
This study aimed to determine the catch composition and compare the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of indigenous and non-indigenous species in longline and trammel net fisheries in the Mediterranean coasts of Türkiye. The data were collected weekly from May 2020 to September 2021 by commercial fishing vessels (n = 62 days for trammel nets, n = 75 days for longlines). The results of the study indicated that more than 90% of the catch composition consisted of non-indigenous species in trammel net fishery and Pterois miles (Bennett, 1828), Siganus rivulatus Forsskål et Niebuhr, 1775, Siganus luridus (Rüppell, 1829), and Scarus ghobban Forsskål, 1775 were the most commonly caught species. Although indigenous species were more common in longlines compared with trammel nets, non-indigenous species Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789) and Lagocephalus suezensis Clark et Gohar, 1953 were represented by relatively high catch ratios. The results also revealed that the CPUE of non-indigenous species exhibited seasonal differences. Although some non-indigenous species caught within this study have a market value, some other highly invasive species do not. Therefore, it is critically important to develop effective management tools to control bio-invasion. This study provides the first comprehensive research by utilizing basic data with relatively long-term surveys in the small-scale fishery on the Mediterranean coasts of Türkiye. The outcomes of this study can provide guidance to decision-makers.
fisheries management, invasive species, Lagocephalus sceleratus, marine invasion, Pterois miles, Siganus luridus, Siganus rivulatus, small-scale fisheries
The Mediterranean basin has a high human population density and is considered a hotspot for climate change consequences (
There is no doubt that in recent years some Lessepsian species are a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, as well as causing an economic loss in some fisheries and are also causing a negative influence on human welfare (
This study was carried out in Kalkan, Kaş, and the Kaş–Kekova Special Environmental Protection Area (SEPA) located on the southern Mediterranean coasts of Türkiye (Fig.
The data were collected weekly from May 2020 to September 2021 by commercial fishing vessels which included trammel nets and longlines. Each month, both trammel net and bottom set longline surveys were attempted four times. However, the data were limited (n = 62 days for trammel nets and n = 75 days for longlines) due to adverse weather conditions in some months, and the commercial landings of the fleet were also negatively affected by these weather conditions at certain times of the year. Regarding the trammel net surveys, the mesh sizes of used gear were 28 and 36 mm and the length of the daily used net ranged between 1000 and 2600 m. On the other hand, concerning the longline surveys, the number of hooks deployed was 10 and pilchard, Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792), was used as bait, which is most commonly used by commercial fishers. The hook number of longlines ranged between 250 and 550 during the survey. The longline surveys were carried out between 20 and 150 m at depth (mainly higher than 50 m), whereas the depth of trammel net surveys varied between 15 and 100 m (mainly lower than 50 m). During the onboard observation, details relating to fishing operations (hook number, net length, soak time) and habitat structure were recorded. The catch composition in terms of wet weight was recorded onboard by observers. The total length (TL) of all specimens of species was measured using calipers and the wet weight of these specimens was recorded using electronic balances. The CPUE values were calculated by standardization of the used net length and hook number; the zero catches were also taken into account in CPUE calculation. For longline surveys, the CPUE estimation was standardized for 1000 hooks (
The results indicated that the mean CPUE of indigenous species was markedly high compared to NIS in longlines (Fig.
The CPUE values of indigenous and non-indigenous species: A) longline, B) trammel net (28 mm mesh size), C) trammel net (36 mm mesh size), seasonal CPUE values of indigenous and non-indigenous species: D) longline, E) trammel net (28 mm mesh size), F) trammel net (36 mm mesh size). The blue and green box-plots indicate indigenous species and non-indigenous species, respectively.
Regarding the catch composition, 32 species were observed throughout the longline surveys and the percentage of indigenous species was 74% (Table
Catch composition (finfish and shellfish), percentage, and biomass information of bottom set longline and trammel nets 28 and 36 mm for 75, 27, and 35 fishing days, respectively.
Catch composition of longline | Percentage [%] | Biomass [kg] | Catch composition of trammel net (28 mm) | Percentage [%] | Biomass [kg] | Catch composition of trammel net (36 mm) | Percentage [%] | Biomass [kg] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lichia amia | 18.85 | 101.2 | Siganus luridus | 25.66 | 48.7 | Pterois miles | 34.62 | 63 |
Pagrus pagrus | 13.38 | 71.85 | Siganus rivulatus | 25.5 | 48.4 | Siganus luridus | 23.08 | 42 |
Muraena helena | 12.24 | 65.7 | Pterois miles | 22.13 | 42 | Scarus ghobban | 16.98 | 30.9 |
Epinephelus costae | 10.47 | 56.2 | Scarus ghobban | 7.38 | 14 | Siganus rivulatus | 8.96 | 16.3 |
Pagellus erythrinus | 9.04 | 48.5 | Lagocephalus sceleratus | 6.43 | 12.2 | Sargocentron rubrum | 6.26 | 11.4 |
Lagocephalus sceleratus | 8.63 | 46.3 | Sargocentron rubrum | 5.22 | 9.9 | Lagocephalus sceleratus | 4.18 | 7.6 |
Conger conger | 5.10 | 27.4 | Sparisoma cretense | 2.11 | 4 | Fistularia commersonii | 2.03 | 3.7 |
Lagocephalus suezensis | 4.30 | 23.1 | Pagellus erythrinus | 1.48 | 2.8 | Lichia amia | 1.15 | 2.1 |
Xiphias gladius | 3.37 | 18.1 | Epinephelus costae | 1.21 | 2.3 | Upeneus pori | 1.04 | 1.9 |
Dentex macrophthalmus | 2.85 | 15.3 | Torpedo marmorata | 0.58 | 1.1 | Lagocephalus suezensis | 0.55 | 1 |
Pagrus caeruleostictus | 2.44 | 13.1 | Saurida lessepsianus | 0.53 | 1 | Epinephelus costae | 0.55 | 1 |
Epinephelus aeneus | 2.12 | 11.4 | Scorpaena porcus | 0.42 | 0.8 | Upeneus moluccensis | 0.38 | 0.7 |
Phycis blennoides | 0.78 | 4.2 | Sepia officinalis | 0.37 | 0.7 | Saurida lessepsianus | 0.11 | 0.2 |
Pterois miles | 0.75 | 4 | Upeneus moluccensis | 0.34 | 0.7 | Scorpaena porcus | 0.11 | 0.2 |
Homarus gammarus | 0.75 | 4 | Parupeneus forsskali | 0.32 | 0.6 | |||
Sargocentron rubrum | 0.63 | 3.4 | Diplodus vulgaris | 0.21 | 0.4 | |||
Saurida lessepsianus | 0.63 | 3.4 | Spicara smaris | 0.11 | 0.2 | |||
Loligo vulgaris | 0.56 | 3 | ||||||
Scarus ghobban | 0.52 | 2.8 | ||||||
Dentex dentex | 0.43 | 2.3 | ||||||
Nemipterus randalli | 0.37 | 2 | ||||||
Diplodus sargus | 0.34 | 1.8 | ||||||
Torpedo marmorata | 0.30 | 1.6 | ||||||
Raja sp. | 0.24 | 1.3 | ||||||
Oblada melanurus | 0.20 | 1.1 | ||||||
Parupeneus forsskali | 0.17 | 0.9 | ||||||
Diplodus vulgaris | 0.15 | 0.8 | ||||||
Pagellus acarne | 0.11 | 0.6 | ||||||
Serranus cabrilla | 0.10 | 0.55 | ||||||
Siganus luridus | 0.09 | 0.5 | ||||||
Serranus scriba | 0.04 | 0.2 | ||||||
Sparisoma cretense | 0.04 | 0.2 |
This study provided evidence of a predominance of NIS in trammel net catches, while the same were less prevalent in the longlines in Kalkan, Kaş, and the Kaş–Kekova SEPA, Eastern Mediterranean. Traditionally, trammel net fishery is generally performed in shallow waters compared with the longline fishery in the Kaş–Kekova SEPA and Kalkan, and it is well-known that some Lessepsian species prefer to live in shallow waters (
In the presently reported study, the most common two species in the trammel nets with 28 mm mesh size were Siganus luridus and Siganus rivulatus, and these consisted of more than half of the total catch. These species also represented significant amounts in the catch of trammel net with a 36 mm mesh size.
The presently reported study demonstrated that the highest CPUE of NIS in trammel nets with 28 mm mesh size was found in the spring and summer months. Similarly,
Our study reports a total of 12 and 9 non-indigenous species in trammel nets and longline surveys, respectively. Among them, 8 species including Siganus luridus, Siganus rivulatus, Upeneus pori, Upeneus moluccensis, Sargocentron rubrum, Nemipterus randalli Russell, 1986, Pterois miles, and Saurida lessepsianus have been sold at local markets. Undoubtedly, having the market value and demand for these species is desirable for both fishers and ecosystem health. There are some factors that may persuade consumers to consume these new species more. For example, the prices of these species are generally more affordable compared to many native species that show decreased populations due to overfishing. Other reasons may be related to the flavor of these species and people’s gastronomic curiosity. Moreover, awareness studies and projects are carried out by some NGOs (e.g., Mediterranean Conservation Society) and their enterprises encouraging the consumption of these species in the region (Pers. comm., Funda Kök). On the other hand, some studies (
In conclusion, the presently reported study shows that indigenous species are dominant in bottom set longline fishery, while NIS are represented with higher CPUE in trammel net fishery in Kalkan, Kaş, and the Kaş–Kekova SEPA, Eastern Mediterranean. Furthermore, in general, the dominance of indigenous species has shown a dramatic decrease over recent decades. Although there have been measures taken by decision-makers to cope with this situation, they are insufficient. In addition to management measures and practices, it is observed that related scientific studies are also insufficient. Therefore, we suggest further research focusing on the catch composition of both trammel and gill nets that have smaller mesh sizes used by the fleet.
This study was supported by Akdeniz Koruma Derneği (Mediterranean Conservation Society) (AKD) through several grants under the “management of invasive alien species” program in partnership with Fauna Flora International (FFI). Therefore, we would like to express our sincere thanks to AKD and FFI for their support. We are also grateful to local fishers for their positive approach to sharing information with us during the data collection.